KATIE HOPKINS ON LBC at 10.00 am - Is it time to stop looking for Maddie?

TheTruthWillOut wrote:

chrissie wrote:Katie saying she wanted to write about this for ages but was never allowed. Questioning the amount spent £12m. What else it could have been spent on, child poverty etc...

Also saying that people have said the parents were called in for questioning, Katie said they may have been called in but didn't answer the questions....

I find this fascinating. Is she just talking about her previous employer (The Sun) or some other 'body'? What stopped her from tweeting or doing a blog if she wanted to give her opinion?

I hope she elaborates on whom prevented her from voicing her opinion which is surely a first!

She did mention the BBC a few seconds later, not sure if it was connected though. Good to hear the Mail and LBC have allowed her to air her views.

It should be on here at some point for those who missed it:

http://lbc.audioagain.com/presenters/37-katie-hopkins

chrissie wrote:It should be on here at some point for those who missed it:

http://lbc.audioagain.com/presenters/37-katie-hopkins

Thanks for that chrissie, no doubt many more will now listen .

Does anyone know what sort of listening figures the LBC station has?

Anyone hear about the photo fits that were sat on? KH said you'll understand why when you see them!

I have no idea how the listening figures work but just found this:

http://www.thisisglobal.com/radio/lbc/audience/#stats

dogs don't lie wrote:Anyone hear about the photo fits that were sat on? KH said you'll understand why when you see them!

Heard the mention of the photofits and that the McCanns sat on them for 5 years, but not the last bit, saw someone say it on twitter, so I must have missed it.

dogs don't lie wrote:Anyone hear about the photo fits that were sat on? KH said you'll understand why when you see them!

Yes, the ones on Crimewatch

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2478087/Why-Madeleine-McCann-suspect-E-fits-kept-secret-5-years.html

candyfloss wrote:

chrissie wrote:It should be on here at some point for those who missed it:

http://lbc.audioagain.com/presenters/37-katie-hopkins

Thanks for that chrissie, no doubt many more will now listen .

Does anyone know what sort of listening figures the LBC station has

According to their webpage 968k listeners this year, as against last years 841k.

candyfloss wrote:

dogs don't lie wrote:Anyone hear about the photo fits that were sat on? KH said you'll understand why when you see them!

Heard the mention of the photofits and that the McCanns sat on them for 5 years, but not the last bit, saw someone say it on twitter, so I must have missed it.  

Yip, I heard it

chrissie wrote:It should be on here at some point for those who missed it:

http://lbc.audioagain.com/presenters/37-katie-hopkins

Thanks, chrissie, i missed it. Looking forward to hearing it later.

Carla Spade ‏@CarlaSpade · 8m8 minutes ago

@tilly_justice #McCann

dogs don't lie wrote:Anyone hear about the photo fits that were sat on? KH said you'll understand why when you see them!

Yes ddl, KH knows how to get her point across.

costello wrote:

candyfloss wrote:

chrissie wrote:It should be on here at some point for those who missed it:

http://lbc.audioagain.com/presenters/37-katie-hopkins

Thanks for that chrissie, no doubt many more will now listen .

Does anyone know what sort of listening figures the LBC station has

According to their webpage 968k listeners this year, as against last years 841k.

Thanks Costello, quite a lot of listeners then, and I expect KT pulls many of them in, so this show must have had a big audience.

Might not be much of a following country-wide, though as it is very much London based

Heard the show and what a breath of fresh air it was. Well done Katie Hopkins I do hope now many more will dare to speak out.

LBC ‏@LBC · 3h3 hours ago  London, England

.@KTHopkins 'I've been stopped from writing about the McCann case and that makes me angry' http://l-bc.co/LBCnow

candyfloss wrote:LBC ‏@LBC  · 3h3 hours ago   London, England  

.@KTHopkins 'I've been stopped from writing about the McCann case and that makes me angry' http://l-bc.co/LBCnow

Perhaps she would like to explain why she had been stopped.

Well,well,well,the Gambling man....Jimbob,the politically correct ex public servant or is it current secret agent man??
Back to comment on missing kids. Ben linked to Maddy....maybe same paedo network perhaps? Not quiet the usual beatification of the McCanns by him interestingly subdued......he can hardly slagg them off or disassociate himself from the Macs.....

Gamble used the phrase 'suspected abduction' when he was referring to Ben and Madeleine. A step backwards?

Dee Coy wrote:Gamble used the phrase 'suspected abduction' when he was referring to Ben and Madeleine. A step backwards?

Yes very noticeable that.

Let's hope truely backward would be "the abducted". His old mate Hugh Orde another ex NI cop is moaning about persuing old missing child cases and such like today. This looks like different factions arguing the toss in public......I mean do you think Gamble and Orde just popped out today coincidently? Me neither.......it's like wacky races now......MUTLEY!!!!

candyfloss wrote:LBC ‏@LBC  · 3h3 hours ago   London, England  

.@KTHopkins 'I've been stopped from writing about the McCann case and that makes me angry' http://l-bc.co/LBCnow

Yeah before I had to nip out I did hear her say she wasn't allowed to write in her column. So that is the Sun but I really hope she elaborates on this because she has worked at LBC as a guest presenter since at least March 2014 and I'm surprised she hasn't talked about this sooner if she was stopped only by the Sun.

I'm thinking here that it was someone/entity much higher up (than The Sun) that has kept her, and everyone, silent all this time and would like to know what/why things have changed.

Its all good though and things really do seem to be changing rapidly.

Bampots wrote:it's like wacky races now......MUTLEY!!!!

Yep!

Katie Hopkins ‏@KTHopkins · 41m41 minutes ago

Thank you for all the kind messages regarding my show @LBC today. Podcast link as requested; http://lbc.audioagain.com/presenters/37-katie-hopkins/397-katie-hopkins-the-whole-show …

Some of those Gamble tweets that was mentioned here earlier:

https://twitter.com/JimGamble_INEQE/status/726892933580988418?lang=en-gb

'...innocent until proven guilty'

Andrew wrote:Some of those Gamble tweets that was mentioned here earlier:

https://twitter.com/JimGamble_INEQE/status/726892933580988418?lang=en-gb

'...innocent until proven guilty'

Gamble should familiarise himself with the the concept of overwhelming circumstantial evidence indicating guilt beyond reasonable doubt.