Sharon Osbourne attacks McCanns for leaving Madeleine - Mirror

Seems to me there is great pressure being exerted here from women calling the M's out on leaving Madeleine alone (weirdly mostly not mentioning the twins were too). Sonia, Katie, Sharon. Anyone else?

Some even believe leaving the kids/neglect was the alibi and a smokescreen. It is like someone/thing is using the M's own claims against them to get the public 'ready'.....

All this seems like it is coordinated? Who knows with this case!

TheTruthWillOut wrote:Seems to me there is great pressure being exerted here from women calling the M's out on leaving Madeleine alone (weirdly mostly not mentioning the twins were too). Sonia, Katie, Sharon. Anyone else?

Some even believe leaving the kids/neglect was the alibi and a smokescreen. It is like someone/thing is using the M's own claims against them to get the public 'ready'.....

All this seems like it is coordinated? Who knows with this case!

It does seem like it is coordinated TTWO, my thoughts this morning too.  Lot of stories of late that are not helpful to the McCanns, a complete turnaround from a few months ago.  Even Mr Amaral is getting fair press, and also the so named 'trolls' being given a fair hearing.  It does almost look like they are preparing the public, for something............   Or is it just that celebrities feel the floodgates have been opened to say what they really feel, who knows.

It could very well just be that the media now know the M's don't have the money to sue. Maybe CM is basically out the picture too and they are on their own.

Not sure but in these articles the last few weeks how many have had 'friend' versus 'spokesman' defending the M's?

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu  · 43m43 minutes ago  

SHARON OSBOURNE RIGHT - LEAVING BABIES ALONE IS INSANE!
http://cristobell.blogspot.co.uk/   #McCann









Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu  · 16m16 minutes ago  

Sharon would eat men in grey for breakfast - and spit out their Injunctions! http://cristobell.blogspot.co.uk/     #McCann

candyfloss wrote:

TheTruthWillOut wrote:Seems to me there is great pressure being exerted here from women calling the M's out on leaving Madeleine alone (weirdly mostly not mentioning the twins were too). Sonia, Katie, Sharon. Anyone else?

Some even believe leaving the kids/neglect was the alibi and a smokescreen. It is like someone/thing is using the M's own claims against them to get the public 'ready'.....

All this seems like it is coordinated? Who knows with this case!

It does seem like it is coordinated TTWO, my thoughts this morning too.  Lot of stories of late that are not helpful to the McCanns, a complete turnaround from a few months ago.  Even Mr Amaral is getting fair press, and also the so named 'trolls' being given a fair hearing.  It does almost look like they are preparing the public, for something............   Or is it just that celebrities feel the floodgates have been opened to say what they really feel, who knows.

If it's co-ordinated, it has started with two women who are highly opinionated and used to controversy so the next step should be reasonable, possibly family orientated celebrities.

We shall see.

A very interesting comment and point from Spudgun, and something I have often wondered.  Why would #McCann not trend many times, it gets thousands of tweets, especially when big news hits, so one has to ask why??





Mike Spudgun ‏@spudgun01

Dear Twitter. How can Madeleine #McCann NOT be trending despite being named in 1000s of tweet associated with Sharon Osbourne for 8 hours?





ann-kristine ‏@fiorifan · 9m9 minutes ago

@1matthewwright1 @spudgun01 I've noticed that #McCann NEVER trends, despite it getting more posts than many that do.

Not using Twitter/Facebook I don't quite understand the "trending" reference.
What I do see is that the result in GA's favour of the Defamation case has opened the floodgates.
What was printed in his book has been affirmed. No lies, no exaggerations - just the facts of the event as given at the time.
It is written and available publicly.
Many details have been suppressed I think and understandably so as these may conflict the reported events of that week and must be withheld for a future prosecution..
I trust GA, I always have. This is a long road we have travelled but be aware TM this will not go away - it will not be forgotten - until the truth is known.

Even 'OK' Magazine are chipping in with this...

http://www.ok.co.uk/celebrity-news/547017/sharon-osbourne-receives-criticism-for-madeleine-mccann-comments

As far as I can see from all these different articles and comments left etc, then she has received no criticism at all.

Apart from one friend of the McCanns.

It's funny really. This talk show where Sharon was speaking was in America. Now most people who were listening to in the states probably didn't even batter an eye lid. The name McCann was not mentioned, so the Americans probably didn't realise what she was on about.

But the Mirror were the first to pick up on it and get out in the Press over here. Then sit back and wait until all other Media outlets pick up on it as well. Then they all sit back and watch it all kick off.

Now if that's not deliberate then I don't know what is.

Andrew wrote:It's funny really. This talk show where Sharon was speaking was in America. Now most people who were listening to in the states probably didn't even batter an eye lid. The name McCann was not mentioned, so the Americans probably didn't realise what she was on about.

But the Mirror were the first to pick up on it and get out in the Press over here. Then sit back and wait until all other Media outlets pick up on it as well. Then they all sit back and watch it all kick off.

Now if that's not deliberate then I don't know what is.

Very astute Andrew.

Andrew wrote:It's funny really. This talk show where Sharon was speaking was in America. Now most people who were listening to in the states probably didn't even batter an eye lid. The name McCann was not mentioned, so the Americans probably didn't realise what she was on about.

But the Mirror were the first to pick up on it and get out in the Press over here. Then sit back and wait until all other Media outlets pick up on it as well. Then they all sit back and watch it all kick off.

Now if that's not deliberate then I don't know what is.

Just as keikaku!?

TheTruthWillOut wrote:

Andrew wrote:It's funny really. This talk show where Sharon was speaking was in America. Now most people who were listening to in the states probably didn't even batter an eye lid. The name McCann was not mentioned, so the Americans probably didn't realise what she was on about.

But the Mirror were the first to pick up on it and get out in the Press over here. Then sit back and wait until all other Media outlets pick up on it as well. Then they all sit back and watch it all kick off.

Now if that's not deliberate then I don't know what is.

Just as keikaku!?

Actually had to look that up, but yes, I would say so....

Kate said: “People say, ‘Why didn’t you get a babysitter?’ Having a babysitter implied there was a risk situation and we just didn’t see it like that.

“We didn’t think it was necessary. It wasn’t to save money.”

But she later added: “It goes without saying that we now bitterly regret it.” Cardiologist Gerry has also said: “Who’s thinking about child abductions in a little sleepy out-of-season tourist resort?

“It never entered our minds. We felt very safe — it was a family resort.

“At home you put your kids to bed and go off and do things about the house and garden and don’t think about it.

“We were checking on our kids only metres away. After, we were consumed with guilt. But we can’t change it.”

Kate is the least rational thinker ever. How she got to be a GP is a mystery. How could leaving three children under the age of four in an unlocked apartment with all sorts of potential hazards not be a risk? They had not even left Madeleine a way to communicate with them in the event of something happening. No baby monitor. No phone. Did Madeleine even know where they were so she could go and find them if there was a problem with one of the twins?

How could this possibly be 'risk free'? It's nonsense.

ETA: But notice how the duplicitous Kate circumnavigates the issue of what the real risks were. She knows perfectly well that the risk of abduction was negligible - she claims there was zero risk of this in her book! - but that there were definitely other real risks. Such as Madeleine getting up to find them and falling down the steps of the balcony. Or being hit by a car on the roads. Or falling into the swimming pool. Or any other thing that might happen when young children are left unattended with no way of contacting an adult in the event of something happening to her or the twins. Even if it is just one of the twins waking up and crying. Imagine how distressing that would be for all three children realizing there was no adult there to comfort them?

Cardiologist Gerry has also said: “Who’s thinking about child abductions in a little sleepy out-of-season tourist resort?"


...ummm - you, Mr Gerry, you and your creepy associates...

The comment section on the DM seems to be back after it was there this morning then got abducted. (although half the comments are still abducted by the looks of it)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3602917/Sharon-Osbourne-slammed-branding-parents-missing-Madeleine-McCann-insane-leaving-daughter-alone.html#comments

poster wrote:Kate said: “People say, ‘Why didn’t you get a babysitter?’ Having a babysitter implied there was a risk situation and we just didn’t see it like that.

“We didn’t think it was necessary. It wasn’t to save money.”

But she later added: “It goes without saying that we now bitterly regret it.” Cardiologist Gerry has also said: “Who’s thinking about child abductions in a little sleepy out-of-season tourist resort?

“It never entered our minds. We felt very safe — it was a family resort.

“At home you put your kids to bed and go off and do things about the house and garden and don’t think about it.

“We were checking on our kids only metres away. After, we were consumed with guilt. But we can’t change it.”

Kate is the least rational thinker ever. How she got to be a GP is a mystery. How could leaving three children under the age of four in an unlocked apartment with all sorts of potential hazards not be a risk? They had not even left Madeleine a way to communicate with them in the event of something happening. No baby monitor. No phone. Did Madeleine even know where they were so she could go and find them if there was a problem with one of the twins.

How could this possibly be 'risk free'? It's nonsense.

Rosa canina wrote:Cardiologist Gerry has also said: “Who’s thinking about child abductions in a little sleepy out-of-season tourist resort?"


...ummm - you, Mr Gerry, you and your creepy associates...

Following those lines of thought to their logical conclusion, why did they even bother with the creche during the day? Surely they thought it would be safe enough to drop the kids at the playground or beach while the adults had their tennis lessons - daylight, non-drowsy kids, sober adults, no burglars (tend to break in at night) & plenty of witnesses to keep an eye out for swarthy foreign abductors.

Rosa canina wrote:Cardiologist Gerry has also said: “Who’s thinking about child abductions in a little sleepy out-of-season tourist resort?"


...ummm - you, Mr Gerry, you and your creepy associates...

This is another good example of McCann speak. It's illogical and disingenuous. Presumably in the very rare instances where a child is abducted by a stranger (as opposed to a family member or someone known to the child which is far more likely) the location could be anywhere. Why would a child abduction be any less rare in a sleepy out-of-season resort than anywhere else?

As if Kate and Gerry said to themselves: 'Oh, at least we don't have to worry about a child abduction because we are in this sleepy tourist resort out of season. Phew! One less thing to worry about.'

The pair of them talk utter nonsense.

Jon gaunt ‏@jongaunt 13h13 hours ago
We will be debating @MrsSOsbourne comments on Mccanns @talk2meradiouk Monday at 10 am . Get free app to listen here http://www.talk2meradio.com

Sharon Osbourne slammed by friend of the McCanns for calling them ‘insane’ for leaving Madeleine alone

Read more: http://metro.co.uk/2016/05/22/sharon-osbourne-slammed-by-friend-of-the-mccanns-for-calling-them-insane-for-leaving-madeleine-alone-5897798/#ixzz49QCvCR5Q

Were the McCanns 'insane' for leaving their young children unsupervised?

Yes - 94%

I can't decide - 3%

No - 3%

Still comments here...

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/7166678/Sharon-Osbourne-slammed-after-calling-Madeleine-McCanns-parents-insane-for-leaving-tot-alone.html

Andrew wrote:Jon gaunt ‏@jongaunt  13h13 hours ago
We will be debating @MrsSOsbourne comments on Mccanns @talk2meradiouk Monday at 10 am . Get free app to listen here http://www.talk2meradio.com

Jon ranting and raving and 'couldn't give a toss' about the McCanns (his words) and all about the 'neglect'. McCanns fault etc.

However, disappointing to hear that he actually does believe in the 'abduction'.

Andrew wrote:

Heisenburg wrote:Another non story,is the news on/or not appealing out soon?

Not sure but often get the thought that there's some deliberate 'work' going on behind the scenes to whip up and invite a public backlash against the Parents. Basically get everyone loathing them.

Which judging by comments left where possible and allowed, then it's certainly working.

This comment from the Kelvin McKenzie opinion story also alludes to this, Andrew. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/suncolumnists/7167892/Kelvin-MacKenzie-If-McCanns-want-our-money-they-have-to-take-our-opinions.html

sherlck holmes
1 hour ago

Do I detect a Mccann tactic now being used in reverse by the media ? Remember the parents ploy of praising the Portuguese police investigation in public and having family, friends and yeah you guessed it the media slaughter them back home..It's took a long time for a lot of people to question the parents lies ridden version of the truth and the TACTICS employed, but now it appears that the media are using us, the media end user to do their bidding by opening up comment sections to bring important issues to the discussion table. It appears there are many, including myself only too willing, but perhaps if the truth is ever to have a chance of being known, it's time the media entered the fray by way of LONG OVERDUE, broad, fact based reporting and the once practised art of professional, investigative journalism was returned to our mainstream media..

There are many important questions where answers are also long overdue..

We may never see the case solved, but that doesn't mean we don't deserve to know the truth..

Perhaps Gerry has pushed his campaigning efforts a little too far in the media's eyes in his demands for the Leveson recommendations to be implemented on behalf of Hacked Off..As for me I'm off to work in disbelieve at the stories now appearing in mainstream media..I suspect the Mccanns will be feeling a little more than disbelieve.

Here's not to persecuting the Mccanns but to discovering the TRUTH..

Sharon Osborne on Loose Women today??




Bobbie Boy ‏@No1Bobbie  · 13m13 minutes ago  

watch #loosewoman start trending #SharoneOsbourne is on talking #McCann today https://www.facebook.com/loosewomen

Comments from the Loose Women facebook page (nicked from twitter) about what Sharon said.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10154628935054879&substory_index=0&id=78781834878

Loose Women

1 hr ·
..

WAS SHARON OSBOURNE RIGHT TO SAY WHAT SHE SAID ABOUT THE MCCANNS?

Former Loose Women Sharon Osbourne has made the headlines over the weekend by speaking about Kate and Gerry McCann and the disappearance of Madeleine.

She said “They left their baby in the room sleeping, sleeping while they went to dinner in the restaurant. While they were in the resort their baby was taken. And it is like, ‘Oh but we can see everything that is going on’ and it is, like, insane.”

A family friend said “Kate and Gerry have never forgiven themselves and this should not have been aired in a random way, as it ­apparently was. It’s based on ignorance of the true facts. While she’s entitled to her view she should keep it to herself.”

Do you agree with Sharon, or is this an incident that could have happened to anyone? Have you changed your holiday behaviour following the disappearance? Is Sharon fair?

Let us know your thoughts - we'll be with you at 12:30pm.