McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Page 8 of 8 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Heisenburg on Sat 11 Feb 2017, 11:01 pm


Page 66,so what are OG actually up to?

However, even in the filing order serious reservations are raised as to the likelihood of the allegation that Madeleine had been abducted. Taking into account the doubts raised by the Jane Tanner/Kate McCann version.

avatar
Heisenburg

Posts : 1540
Join date : 2016-01-11

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Bampots on Sun 12 Feb 2017, 1:10 am

Heisenburg wrote:
Page 66,so what are OG actually up to?

However, even in the filing order serious reservations are raised as to the likelihood of the allegation that Madeleine had been abducted. Taking into account the doubts raised by the Jane Tanner/Kate McCann version.

Thank you for highlighting this bit.....the overall picture is so difficult to get a grip of! Reading it is very difficult... ..rhis great translation reads as if they have used an app....very difficult to get a hold of....but the above seems clear. .....and to follow they most certainly should have returned for the reconstruction.....

Those doubts that the investigation intended to see clarified by the reconstitution of the events mentioned in the closing dispatch, an initiative however that was made unfeasible by the witnesses' failure to appear after being summoned to.
 
Really important!!

_________________
Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts
Winston Churchill 
avatar
Bampots

Posts : 2282
Join date : 2014-09-07
Age : 56

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  candyfloss on Sun 12 Feb 2017, 8:46 am

Bampots wrote:
Heisenburg wrote:
Page 66,so what are OG actually up to?

However, even in the filing order serious reservations are raised as to the likelihood of the allegation that Madeleine had been abducted. Taking into account the doubts raised by the Jane Tanner/Kate McCann version.

Thank you for highlighting this bit.....the overall picture is so difficult to get a grip of! Reading it is very difficult... ..rhis great translation reads as if they have used an app....very difficult to get a hold of....but the above seems clear. .....and to follow they most certainly should have returned for the reconstruction.....

Those doubts that the investigation intended to see clarified by the reconstitution of the events mentioned in the closing dispatch, an initiative however that was made unfeasible by the witnesses' failure to appear after being summoned to.
 
Really important!!

Quite!





The Truth be Told
‏@ThePonceofDubai



Why are no newspapers camped outside the #McCann s house asking for a comment on the Supreme Court ruling? @TheSun @thesundaytimes @SkyNews







_________________
  
   

Sometimes you will never know the true value of a moment until it becomes a memory.......... Dr Seuss
avatar
candyfloss
Admin

Posts : 11740
Join date : 2014-08-18
Age : 65

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Heisenburg on Sun 12 Feb 2017, 9:40 am

Probably all contact will have to go through their lawyers now,they may well protest their innocence and rightly so,but that doesn't and won't answer how they claim to have been exonerated of any involvement.
avatar
Heisenburg

Posts : 1540
Join date : 2016-01-11

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Andrew on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 10:43 am

All gone frustratingly quiet... Just as the momentum was building fairly rapidly and nicely, then it appears to have come to a halt.
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  espeland on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 11:06 am


I'll bet it hasn't come to a halt for the TAPAS9, they'll be quaking. I wonder if their phones have been tapped.
avatar
espeland

Posts : 226
Join date : 2015-06-04

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  dogs don't lie on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm

You'd expect that wouldn't you? It's a pity Portugal couldn't have arranged that before the news of the case came out, or could they? Especially the part with JT mentioned.

_________________
Fight for Madeleine x
avatar
dogs don't lie

Posts : 2686
Join date : 2014-11-24
Age : 42
Location : Ireland

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  espeland on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 12:27 pm

No, it would be authorised by the Home Office. But of course, OG could have requested it.


Last edited by espeland on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 12:34 pm; edited 1 time in total
avatar
espeland

Posts : 226
Join date : 2015-06-04

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  dogs don't lie on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 12:34 pm

espeland wrote:
No, it would be set up by the Home Office. But of course, OG could have requested it.

Thanks espeland, was this their last line of enquiry? Is this what they were waiting for? I know, I know...

_________________
Fight for Madeleine x
avatar
dogs don't lie

Posts : 2686
Join date : 2014-11-24
Age : 42
Location : Ireland

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  espeland on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 12:39 pm

dogs don't lie wrote:
espeland wrote:
No, it would be set up by the Home Office. But of course, OG could have requested it.

Thanks espeland, was this their last line of enquiry? Is this what they were waiting for? I know, I know...


That's what many of us suspect.

A real bit of speculation here, there four officers left in OG and four couples in the T9 - one to conduct the interviews in each case with support from the local police. Do the T8 all live in different parts of the country?
avatar
espeland

Posts : 226
Join date : 2015-06-04

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Freedom on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 12:42 pm

I believe so. I know that JT and RO'B are in the Exeter area and the Oldfields in South London. The Paynes I'm not sure about, nearer to the McCanns or they were anyway back in 2007.
avatar
Freedom
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 15698
Join date : 2014-08-17
Age : 103
Location : The nearest darkened room

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  dogs don't lie on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm

NW works in silence eh!?! Suspect

_________________
Fight for Madeleine x
avatar
dogs don't lie

Posts : 2686
Join date : 2014-11-24
Age : 42
Location : Ireland

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  bluebell on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 3:33 pm

I'm sorry but I'm still trying to catch up here. What about GA's book? Will this allow him to publish in the UK. No doubt been discussed on this thread, but so many links etc to read so just wondered if anyone can answer this for me please?

_________________
The pure and simple truth is rarely pure, and never simple.        Oscar Wilde
avatar
bluebell

Posts : 1677
Join date : 2014-09-01
Age : 100
Location : S/W UK

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Andrew on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 3:40 pm

bluebell wrote:I'm sorry but I'm still trying to catch up here.   What about GA's book?   Will this allow him to publish in the UK.  No doubt been discussed on this thread, but so many links etc to read so just wondered if anyone can answer this for me please?

Personally, I think it's only a matter of time before we see his book published here in the UK and sold in the shops.

avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  espeland on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 3:48 pm

Andrew wrote:
bluebell wrote:I'm sorry but I'm still trying to catch up here.   What about GA's book?   Will this allow him to publish in the UK.  No doubt been discussed on this thread, but so many links etc to read so just wondered if anyone can answer this for me please?

Personally, I think it's only a matter of time before we see his book published here in the UK and sold in the shops.



If he can't publish it/them here, he could always publish in Australia or the USA: I got my copy of Spycatcher from New York via post.
avatar
espeland

Posts : 226
Join date : 2015-06-04

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Andrew on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 3:59 pm

What would be great if one of the mainstream channels showed his documentary on a prime time slot.

First things first though.
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Andrew on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 4:15 pm

Andrew wrote:What would be great if one of the mainstream channels showed his documentary on a prime time slot.

First things first though.

Sorry to quote my own - but Panorama were over. Maybe they were doing a translated reboot of it cheers
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  dogs don't lie on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 4:35 pm

I think it's time everyone heard the factual side and not just the mcs side.

_________________
Fight for Madeleine x
avatar
dogs don't lie

Posts : 2686
Join date : 2014-11-24
Age : 42
Location : Ireland

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Andrew on Thu 22 Jun 2017, 9:50 am

Nothing to do with any of the above.

Just didn't know where to put it.

https://www.ecr.co.za/shows/damon-beard/what-would-you-ask-the-universe-to-explain/

Post transferred from the afternoon all topic.
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 8 of 8 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum