McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Page 2 of 8 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  candyfloss on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 10:22 am

Katie Hopkins ‏@KTHopkins  · 1h  
 
Strangely, this was nearly a year ago to the day... #McCann
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3457221/KATIE-HOPKINS-ll-never-know-really-happened-Maddy-parents-accept-share-blame-let-go.html

_________________
  
   

Sometimes you will never know the true value of a moment until it becomes a memory.......... Dr Seuss
avatar
candyfloss
Admin

Posts : 11034
Join date : 2014-08-18
Age : 65

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Helenmeg on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 10:23 am

candyfloss wrote:
Poe wrote:I hoped this would happen but I'm still shocked at the speed the whole McCann house of cards is toppling Shocked

I think everyone is stunned into silence Smile   It was a shock to see that lot this morning though.   So what next I wonder?

Red faces from Lorraine Kel and that presenter of Desert Island Discs/ Crimewatch would be nice
avatar
Helenmeg

Posts : 664
Join date : 2014-11-11

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Helenmeg on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 10:25 am

This is good stuff.. I thought people were being optimistic to say this would be in the tabloids but no - it's finally happening. Back in 2007 they were printing
similar stuff and now 10 years later things have finally come full circle.... justice is hopefully prevailing
avatar
Helenmeg

Posts : 664
Join date : 2014-11-11

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Andrew on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 10:25 am

What next...? Try this one on for size.....

Polícia Judiciária issue European Arrest Warrants to the McCanns and their Tapas friends.


Tomorrows news maybe? cheers
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Andrew on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 10:39 am

A very good slideshow there, Birdy. Excellent in fact.

You say from SKY.....? scratch

(ETA - there were a couple of pictures on there that I've never seen before)


Last edited by Andrew on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 10:41 am; edited 2 times in total
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  candyfloss on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 10:40 am

I can't see anything on the SKY news site at all Birdy?

_________________
  
   

Sometimes you will never know the true value of a moment until it becomes a memory.......... Dr Seuss
avatar
candyfloss
Admin

Posts : 11034
Join date : 2014-08-18
Age : 65

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Bampots on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 10:41 am

AndyB wrote:
Bampots wrote:Hows this one for size. .....
The McCanns are lambasted by the newspapers accused of everything bar killing M. Their characters are destroyed and then OG publish a Ben Needham style statement saying they know what happened(tragic accident etc!)but have insufficient evidence to prosecute.....McCanns exit stage left for island in med close to PdL or perhaps that would be too close and they may go to the land of plenty down under. Everyone in Uk left bemused!
Anyone else agree to my little scenario??
Nope. You're forgetting about the super (inaudible) that, if it means super-injunction,  severely constrains what the press can say and are assuming that OG are actively  pursuing the truth, for which there is no evidence whatsoever
What ive suggested doesnt reveal any truth....they say it was accident but have insufficent evidence!

_________________
Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts
Winston Churchill 
avatar
Bampots

Posts : 2244
Join date : 2014-09-07
Age : 56

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  candyfloss on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 10:44 am

Just WOW!!



P_R ‏@Papa___Rico · 11m11 minutes ago

#McCann





_________________
  
   

Sometimes you will never know the true value of a moment until it becomes a memory.......... Dr Seuss
avatar
candyfloss
Admin

Posts : 11034
Join date : 2014-08-18
Age : 65

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Freedom on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 10:47 am

It's from a gossipy showbiz site called Wizzed.

I am having trouble accessing it.
avatar
Freedom
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 14689
Join date : 2014-08-17
Age : 102
Location : The nearest darkened room

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Andrew on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 11:07 am

It's good to see that folk from the other side of the world are hearing about it:

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11797718
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Poe on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 11:10 am

For me, the worst case scenario (best case scenario for the McCanns) is that there is insufficient evidence to bring charges although it strikes me as unlikely given that the timescale for the investigation has been extended and extra funding provided.

As for the McCanns emigrating, where could they possibly go? Their dream destination would have been New Zealand but they used that poor girl for fake sightings and, as I was typing this, Andrew provided a link to a NZ newspaper. The McCanns made sure Madeleine's name and face are known worldwide. They might end up free from prosecution but they won't ever escape the fear of being recognised.
avatar
Poe

Posts : 936
Join date : 2014-09-02

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  PMR on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 11:13 am

If written off as a tragic accident that the Mc's knew about there  are several more crimes then in the frame. Prevent lawful burial, possibly conspiracy to pervert the course of justice,ones related to obstruction of the coroner etc .Then there's the fund ,people who gave hard earned cash to search for Maddie aren't going to sit back and take it calmly if it's proven that the Mc's knew she was or was likely dead
avatar
PMR

Posts : 547
Join date : 2014-09-27

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  chirpyinsect on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 11:23 am

Freedom wrote:It's from a gossipy showbiz site called Wizzed.

I am having trouble accessing it.
Wizzed is an internet based entertainment site started by 17 year old Aaron Rice from Cheshire. He started out by creating sites for cheat and hints on gaming sites.
The whole slideshow has an air of familiarity about it, in style and content. Has someone found an outlet I wonder?
I like the presentation. The photos and short paragraphs keep the attention far better than a long diatribe would. The interactive nature will appeal to a younger audience too.

_________________
Everything I write is my own opinion. Nothing stated as fact.
avatar
chirpyinsect

Posts : 4644
Join date : 2014-10-18

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Andrew on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 11:33 am

Posted by PORTUGALPRESS on February 09, 2017
UK media rounds on Supreme Court ‘shock’ that McCanns “have not been proved innocent”

UK tabloids - which for so long have been so ‘anti-Portuguese’ in their reporting of the Madeleine McCann mystery - are changing their tune following publication of the Supreme Court judgement which stressed that parents Kate and Gerry McCann have not been proved innocent in the context of their daughter’s disappearance (click here).

Media sources in touch with the Resident warn: “The tide is turning in UK. Did you know that Panorama was in Luz last week? Tell your readers to batten down, they’re all coming”.

The Sun, the Mirror, the Daily Mail began the day leading with hurtful headlines.

Curiously, the Daily Mail’s “Portuguese court says Madeleine McCann’s parents HAVEN’T been cleared” (with large capital letters for the word haven’t) was later changed to: “Fresh anguish for Madeleine McCann's parents as Portugal's supreme court insists they haven't been proved innocent over their daughter's death”.

But the thrust of the story is busily steaming its way through the English-speaking mainstream while the McCann couple themselves, and their representatives, must be considering a response with care.

Says the Mail: “A spokesperson for the McCann’s did not want to respond to request for comment last night”, while the Mirror - running with the story under “Kate and Gerry McCann ‘not formally in the clear’ over daughter Madeleine’s disappearance” says the Supreme Court ruling “means suspicion still hangs over the heads of the McCanns, who have always claimed their innocence”.

Another cloud highlighted by the ruling is the fact that there remain “serious concerns relating to the truth that Madeleine was kidnapped” (Daily Mail today, as well as Portuguese papers, quoting directly from the 76-page text).

For Praia da Luz - the holiday village perennially dragged into the spotlight over this almost decade-long mystery - the question on everyone’s minds is “if there is a media stampede back” could it spell a rush of welcome pre-season business, and would it disappear in time to let the popular sun-blessed village enjoy a trouble-free summer?

natasha.donn@algarveresident.com
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  candyfloss on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 11:46 am

snipped from Portugal Resident article..



Media sources in touch with the Resident warn: “The tide is turning in UK. Did you know that Panorama was in Luz last week? Tell your readers to batten down, they’re all coming”.



ShockedShocked

_________________
  
   

Sometimes you will never know the true value of a moment until it becomes a memory.......... Dr Seuss
avatar
candyfloss
Admin

Posts : 11034
Join date : 2014-08-18
Age : 65

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Andrew on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 11:52 am

Very interesting Suspect
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Birdy on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 11:56 am

WOW !!! Things are changing rapidly, there WILL be justice for Maddie IMO.
I found the slideshow on Sky news. Went on Trending & it was down the bottom of page with other sponsored links for Sky. Hopefully it caught the attention of many readers. Now, alas it has been whooshed Rolling Eyes They must still have the Cruckers still hard at work.
avatar
Birdy

Posts : 29
Join date : 2015-10-27

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  espeland on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm


Interesting it was on Sky. In one their newspaper reviews last week, one of the guests highlighted an article on the SC result and was immediately 'shushed' by the presenter. Also, Sonia Poulton tweeted this last month:

Sonia Poulton ‏@SoniaPoulton Jan 11

Off Twitter for now (contact: soniapoulton@sky.com) but on BBCRScot with Kaye Adams after 11am today #singleparent #myths Happy 2017 Y'all!

She hasn't tweeted since. She isn't directly involved in the case, but does know a lot about it - perhaps she was involved in the slide show?



avatar
espeland

Posts : 215
Join date : 2015-06-04

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  chrissie on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 12:13 pm

The tide is definitely turning at last bounce bounce bounce
avatar
chrissie

Posts : 473
Join date : 2014-09-03

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Heisenburg on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 12:36 pm

Blimey,well I'll go to foot of my stairs,what the MSM have done is actually print stuff from a court ruling thus negating any injunctions, if there were any.
I think I can see how its been played out over the years, rightly so the MSM haven't been allowed to question the McCann version because this could lead to damages,but what can be done now is explore perhaps other theories or at least mention them because a court has decided that it is legally right to do so albeit from another country.
avatar
Heisenburg

Posts : 1357
Join date : 2016-01-11

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Heisenburg on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 12:52 pm

Just a thought,wonder if the Express lawyers and others are carefully studying the judgement to see if their stories at the time that they were sued for is closely tied to this judgement,they got their money back from one J Archer.
avatar
Heisenburg

Posts : 1357
Join date : 2016-01-11

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Admin on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 1:00 pm

Heisenburg wrote:Just a thought,wonder if the Express lawyers and others are carefully studying the judgement to see if their stories at the time that they were sued for is closely tied to this judgement,they got their money back from one J Archer.
There's a thought.

_________________
 
I'd put Cuddle Cat under my pillow at night to be closer to my baby. Not wash memories away - Katie Hopkins
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1369
Join date : 2014-08-17

http://maddiemccannmystery.forumotion.co.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  chrissie on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 1:00 pm

Heisenburg wrote:Just a thought,wonder if the Express lawyers and others are carefully studying the judgement to see if their stories at the time that they were sued for is closely tied to this judgement,they got their money back from one J Archer.

Good point. I was surprised that we haven't heard from The Express yet.
avatar
chrissie

Posts : 473
Join date : 2014-09-03

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 8 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum