Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Page 5 of 6 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Andrew on Wed 22 Mar 2017, 4:26 pm

avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Andrew on Wed 22 Mar 2017, 11:37 pm

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/599164/madeleine-mccann-fund-cop-parents

......?????

Maddie Cop set to ruin parents.

I kid you not - it said that as quick as it got whooshed.
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Andrew on Wed 22 Mar 2017, 11:42 pm

Bizarre... Looked again and it says an hour ago? Although the link still doesn't work... and it's slightly changed:

Maddie cop set to ruin the McCanns
Daily Star - ‎1 hour ago‎
Madeleine McCann disappeared on 3rd May 2007 from her bed in a holiday apartment in Praia da Luz, a resort in the Algarve region of Portugal. It is the most reported case of a missing child in modern history. We take a look at the pictures that made ...



avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  bluebell on Thu 23 Mar 2017, 12:34 pm

Apart from The Mail (and comments there are very anti) there are no comments on any of the articles.
Is everyone just fed up and not interested now, or are comments not being allowed?

_________________
The pure and simple truth is rarely pure, and never simple.        Oscar Wilde
avatar
bluebell

Posts : 1677
Join date : 2014-09-01
Age : 100
Location : S/W UK

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Andrew on Thu 23 Mar 2017, 1:04 pm

bluebell wrote:Apart from The Mail (and comments there are very anti)  there are no comments on any of the articles.  
Is everyone just fed up and not interested now, or are comments not being allowed?

I should imagine the Sun in particular have had a lot of 'noise' coming from TM in regards to the comments being left in the past so they probably just decided it's easier (for them) just not to allow them....
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Andrew on Thu 23 Mar 2017, 4:27 pm

Nicked from Twitter:



I was reading the Daily Mail in a cafe at lunchtime but didn't see anything (mind you I was mainly reading the London stuff so didn't get through it all).

Understandable it was only on page 9 with other events happening. Unsure if other papers had it in though...
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Heisenburg on Thu 23 Mar 2017, 4:36 pm

From the article,"the couple now only have the court of human rights to go to in their battle with Mr Amaral" wrong that is lost,the battle is now against the state of Portugal.
avatar
Heisenburg

Posts : 1490
Join date : 2016-01-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Andrew on Thu 23 Mar 2017, 4:45 pm

True, H.

But as long as it says the following for the masses to read then I'm reasonably satisfied with that (for a bit)...

McCanns lost.

Faked abduction.

Truth of the Lie book.
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Andrew on Thu 23 Mar 2017, 7:24 pm

Page 19 in the Star.

Picked up a copy in the boozer earlier.
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  unreorganised on Fri 24 Mar 2017, 9:30 am

Andrew wrote:Page 19 in the Star.

Picked up a copy in the boozer earlier.

It was in the print version of the Mirror, verso (ie. the side you're less likely to read), about 2/3 of a page, quite some way in.
avatar
unreorganised

Posts : 1471
Join date : 2016-06-16

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Andrew on Fri 24 Mar 2017, 10:10 am

unreorganised wrote:
Andrew wrote:Page 19 in the Star.

Picked up a copy in the boozer earlier.

It was in the print version of the Mirror, verso (ie. the side you're less likely to read), about 2/3 of a page, quite some way in.

Did it have a picture of Heidi Klum next to it as well?

Some more anyway:

http://radaronline.com/videos/madeleine-mccann-kidnapping-lawsuit-parents-bankrupt-lost-case-fired-detective-claimed-killed-child/

Kidnapped Maddie McCann’s Desperate Parents Now Facing Bankruptcy
Missing tot’s mom and dad lost their case against a corrupt cop.



Kidnapped......

Corrupt.......

A load of sh!t.
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  unreorganised on Fri 24 Mar 2017, 10:23 am

Andrew wrote:
Did it have a picture of Heidi Klum next to it as well?

Some more anyway:

http://radaronline.com/videos/madeleine-mccann-kidnapping-lawsuit-parents-bankrupt-lost-case-fired-detective-claimed-killed-child/

Kidnapped Maddie McCann’s Desperate Parents Now Facing Bankruptcy
Missing tot’s mom and dad lost their case against a corrupt cop.



Kidnapped......

Corrupt.......

A load of sh!t.

I'm not totally sure who Heidi Klum is to be honest. One of those media names I can't match to an actual person.

Anyway that article and website is National Enquirer level.
avatar
unreorganised

Posts : 1471
Join date : 2016-06-16

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Poe on Fri 24 Mar 2017, 10:29 am

There seems to be two stories being promoted: lost the case, faked abduction & Truth of the Lie or kidnapped, corrupt cop & McCanns facing bankruptcy.

While the first version is sticking to the facts and the second version seems to be McCann spin, the second version is actually damaging to the McCanns because it is telling people who donated cash to fund the search for Madeleine that their money is being used to pay the McCanns' debts.

The McCanns aren't coming out of this smelling of roses whichever version you read.

_________________
“When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say."
George R. R. Martin, A Clash of Kings.
avatar
Poe

Posts : 963
Join date : 2014-09-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Andrew on Fri 24 Mar 2017, 10:30 am

Very Happy

Heidi Klum...... Google it and you'll never forget.
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Andrew on Fri 24 Mar 2017, 10:32 am

Poe wrote:There seems to be two stories being promoted: lost the case, faked abduction & Truth of the Lie or kidnapped, corrupt cop & McCanns facing bankruptcy.

While the first version is sticking to the facts and the second version seems to be McCann spin, the second version is actually damaging to the McCanns because it is telling people who donated cash to fund the search for Madeleine that their money is being used to pay the McCanns' debts.

The McCanns aren't coming out of this smelling of roses whichever version you read.

They stink of sh!t. And have done for some time.
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Poe on Fri 24 Mar 2017, 10:39 am

Andrew wrote:
Poe wrote:There seems to be two stories being promoted: lost the case, faked abduction & Truth of the Lie or kidnapped, corrupt cop & McCanns facing bankruptcy.

While the first version is sticking to the facts and the second version seems to be McCann spin, the second version is actually damaging to the McCanns because it is telling people who donated cash to fund the search for Madeleine that their money is being used to pay the McCanns' debts.

The McCanns aren't coming out of this smelling of roses whichever version you read.

They stink of cadaverine. And have done for some time.

Fixed that for you Very Happy

_________________
“When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say."
George R. R. Martin, A Clash of Kings.
avatar
Poe

Posts : 963
Join date : 2014-09-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Andrew on Fri 24 Mar 2017, 10:43 am

Yes, that as well, Poe.

Very Happy
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  chrissie on Fri 24 Mar 2017, 11:36 am

Haha Poe Very Happy
avatar
chrissie

Posts : 496
Join date : 2014-09-03

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Andrew on Fri 24 Mar 2017, 6:05 pm

Snipped from the end:

Amaral has been keeping his own silence as he works hard on the finishing touches of his second book on the Madeleine mystery - aimed for a publishing date at the end of April to coincide with the 10-year anniversary of the child’s disappearance.

cheers
avatar
Andrew

Posts : 13085
Join date : 2014-08-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  bluebell on Fri 24 Mar 2017, 6:39 pm

This is the original article in full Andrew.   So good to read news like this now thought it worth c/ping here.


Posted by PORTUGALPRESS on March 24, 2017
Silence settles over McCann’s “costly” court defeat

Since news that the parents of Madeleine McCann have lost their third court bid for damages against former PJ coordinator Gonçalo Amaral, relative silence has settled over the British media.

Only one tabloid appears to be flying provocative headlines, while it has been left to a fringe news site to put them into ‘journalese’.

The Daily Star proclaimed yesterday that the “Fund set up to find missing Madeleine Mccann could be wiped out”.

Radaronline ran with the far more sensationalist assertion that parents Kate and Gerry “are facing bankruptcy”.


[i]The truth is possibly somewhere in between - which, as Portuguese tabloid Correio da Manhã admits, “will be expensive” whatever the final amount.

The ruling by Supreme Court judges released last week leaves the Leicester couple liable for not only their own court costs, but those incurred by Amaral in a series of hearings.

The Star maintains that “no figure has been agreed, but it will be six figures and could use up all the cash left in the fund set up to find Madeleine, if trustees agree to release the cash”.

CM appears to have misread the Star’s story, and suggest the final figure for the couple’s court costs will be €100,000.

This could not possibly ‘wipe out’ the Find Madeleine Fund, as this stands - according to the Star - at £714,800
(or €826,000).

At no point in any of the stories following up on this protracted legal battle has there been any clue as to whether Amaral will be lodging his own civil action for damages - a possibility he has floated in the press in the past (click here).

Indeed, Amaral has been keeping his own silence as he works hard on the finishing touches of his second book on the Madeleine mystery - aimed for a publishing date at the end of April to coincide with the 10-year anniversary of the child’s disappearance.

[/i]

_________________
The pure and simple truth is rarely pure, and never simple.        Oscar Wilde
avatar
bluebell

Posts : 1677
Join date : 2014-09-01
Age : 100
Location : S/W UK

Back to top Go down

Re: Annulment request REJECTED by Supreme Court

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 5 of 6 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum