Madeleine McCann: An Investigation Discovery (ID) Murder Mystery

Madeleine Case Tweets

SHOCKING!!
From Famous American Crime Show.. Madeleine’s possible death re-enacted straight out of public police files
THE TRUTH leaking out
#McCann #MadeleineMcCann



Madeleine Case Tweets

It’s one of the biggest networks in the world all about theory and Amaral presented his successfully I thought it was most unbiased I have ever seen.





PAT BROWN ‏ @ProfilerPatB · Apr 26

PAT BROWN Retweeted Madeleine CaseTweets

Nice to see this actually visualized and this is my theory as well. I have always agreed with Gonçalo Amaral as to these basic determinations based on the evidence. #mccann






PAT BROWN ‏ @ProfilerPatB



Madeleine McCann: An ID Murder Mystery is NOT unbiased and it DID trash Gonçalo Amaral as I expected. Bit it is a more clever pro Mccann doc than Netflix. Blog coming soon with analysis. #mccann



MadeleineCase Tweets
Replying to @ProfilerPatB

The people who I had watch felt this was very damning for McCanns and his theory more believable than the McCanns




PAT BROWN ‏ @ProfilerPatB · 2h2 hours ago

Yeah, well, a certain few on the edge and encouraged by so so e with knowledge may think so. It is true more facts were shown (that’s good) but they came around to saying Amaral was wrong. So, still pro #mccann and most will still believe they are innocent.

This seems to be an extract from it. It was shown on 7th April so I'm surprised we haven't heard of it before.

I wonder if the two are the same. Quest Red is a Discovery channel as is Investigation Discovery. I think it must be the same one not two separate documentaries.

It is repeated on Discovery on May 6th and 7th so maybe that is how the confusion occurred? Anyone know any different?

The Discovery channel programme was mentioned on the Happy Easter topic!

https://www.discoveryuk.com/series/the-madeleine-mccann-mystery/

I really am unsure how many programmes there are.

The clip that I've just posted (whatever programme it's from) is garbage.

A review from Pat Brown.

https://patbrownprofiling.blogspot.com/2019/04/madeline-mccann-id-murder-mystery-is.html?fbclid=IwAR3Ru-Fi5oayovfFWCWLrpiRox0-LK5Ca8CxuI9iSxcegsK9hJ2vcF5zIOE

Freedom wrote:A review from Pat Brown.

https://patbrownprofiling.blogspot.com/2019/04/madeline-mccann-id-murder-mystery-is.html?fbclid=IwAR3Ru-Fi5oayovfFWCWLrpiRox0-LK5Ca8CxuI9iSxcegsK9hJ2vcF5zIOE

Saturday, April 27, 2019




Madeline McCann: An ID Murder Mystery is Still not Objective Treatment of the Case









The new Discovery documentary may be a whole lot better than that complete propaganda piece put out by Netflix recently, but it is still meant to sway the viewers in favor of the McCann’s innocence and it is very manipulative in doing so.

Here is how this works:

During the first half they present Goncalo Amaral’s case. They have him speak.  They actually admit there is no evidence of abduction. They even show the dogs doing their great work. They quite effectively help the audience to see that it is possible to suspect the parents for good reasons.

I admit, it is quite shocking and amazing as we,who believe this evidence does indeed support the parents’ involvement in Maddie going missing, have not seen this level of what appears to be honesty; this appears to be a program willing to present the facts. We see it as a Great Leap Forward with the media. I am not complaining about this aspect because, hey, it IS something that is quite satisfying.

But, I knew there had to be a second half of the show that would effectively trash this evidence, Amaral’s theory, and the Portuguese police. And, I was not wrong. The second half did just that. It pretty much stated that Amaral’s theory was debunked by the DNA evidence, the physical evidence he was so hoping would prove him right. And, then, in comes Scotland Yard to do the case properly, find long ignored witnesses and suspects and, now, we start seeing that the parents, in spite of certain anomalies, could not possibly have hurt their daughter and covered up the crime. Why, it’s nonsense! Even Smithman couldn’t possibly be Gerry because, we all know “for a fact” that he was in the Tapas with everyone at the time the Smiths saw the man with the child.And the carefully selected host of the show, the journalists, the always pro- McCann Summers and Swan are used like product placement....right time, right part of the documentary....in order to promote the agenda which is still “the McCanns are innocent.”

Notice what the documentary did NOT do.

They present the facts that there was no evidence of abduction, but later claimed she was abducted yet ignored the earlier demonstration that there was no such proof. Oddly, when they did the burglar bit, they had the fellows in the re-enactment running around in the flat which is hard to buy as they would have left evidence of breaking in and mucking about.

They claimed the DNA proved Madeleine did not die in the flat nor was her corpse carried in the vehicle but they did not explain why the dogs went nuts both in the flat and at the car.

They didn’t explain that Scotland Yard’s claim of Tannerman being a guest carrying his child made little sense. Why they didn’t even show Jane on the street with Gerry and Jez! They showed a completely inaccurate depiction of Jane walking right by Tannerman where there were some stairs. What?

The documentary never allowed Goncalo to rebut any of their claims.

They had me on for a news clip but they made sure I also wasn’t on the show to likewise rebut the nonsensical claims they made.

In other words, they controlled the narrative. Essentially, the prosecution presentated their case and then the defense. But, they never gave the prosecution a chance to respond to the defense which means the defense is the last bit the audience gets.

One might think there was still enough in the documentary to sway people who have never seen the evidence before and now might think the McCanns are less than innocent. Surely, some will be won over. But, media goes with numbers and the numbers are in their corner if they keep controlling the agenda and presenting a very biased show.

I will say the most surprising thing on the show for me was, at the end of the show, Colin Sutton saying that the Scotland Yard investigation lacked legitimacy because they didn’t start at the table and abduction was ruled out before they even analyzed all the evidence. I would like to believe there was someone at Discovery who did that on purpose to throw a wrench in the McCanns-must-be-innocent theory and while it is possible, I tend to think it may have been an oversight in the editing process.

So, I am glad some of you see progress in this documentary and are happy that some of the truth came out even if most of the audience won’t go away realizing that this really was the truth. But, while I am happier with this show than many, I am still not surprised and still very frustrated that the media is not interested in truly being objective. If Discovery ID really wanted to examine the case, they would have let Goncalo, Colin, me and any other experts discuss all the issues of the case and leave it for the viewers to truly decide what theory the evidence really supports.
 

But then, they would probably be Carter-Rucked.


Criminal Profiler Pat Brown
April 27, 2019



Posted by Pat Brown

I saw the film from about 45 min in - I had forgotten it was on.

So I missed the part where Sr Amaral was allowed to state his case.

I found what I saw very depressing - the usual suspects Clarence Mitchell, Mark Williams Thomas, Summers & Swan etc

At one point it was stated that Gerry & Kate were so disappointed by the lack of progress that 21 days after Maddie vanished they then moved to set up a Fund to receive donations for their own search. Now I am not 100% certain the film had 21 days as I was trying not to fall asleep as it was after midnight at this point - but if I am right thats a false statement as they lost no time in setting up the limited company that was not a charity - in her 'truthful' book Kate wrote about the unnamed legal duo who came out to PDL the weekend of 11 May and how the Fund was set up by May 15. This is well before '21 days'. And it would have been simple for the film producers to check Company House UK to get the date of incorporation.

Mark Williams Thomas claimed he spoke to Martin Smith. Now I never heard that before - can any member throw any light on this? I understood Mr Smith kept away from the media etc. He did speak to the irish journalist Gemma O'Doherty but I think that was because of her reputation in Ireland and the fact that she is irish and he would have trusted her.

The film said Kate ran into the restaurant (Tapas bar?) and screamed 'they've taken her,' I don't think she actually ran back to the rest of them. Wasn't she shouting from outside the apartment.

The film said any forensic evidence was destroyed by the time the police came - ie implying the police were to blame and that they took a long time to come. They did not say you'd expect of group of doctors to be aware of the importance of forensic evidence and to have kept out of the apartment as it was a crime scene once they were sure Maddy was not there.

Is there a link so I can watch the first part that I missed?

Could the first part be the link I posted yesterday? There was a mention about the McCanns being disappointed about the lack of progress and Anthony Summers appeared in it.

P.S. I've certainly never heard of Mark Williams Thomas talking to Martin Smith.