Sonia Poulton's documentary

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

Cristobell wrote:It is only of interest to themselves Freedom, it doesn't bother me one iota what people think, if they judge my character by that misquote in the Sun, then their intentions are clear.  There really isn't anything I can do or say to appease those who think their own reputations have been besmirched by association, other than reiterate, I am a lone wolf(ess), I am not affiliated to anyone, not online, and not in the real world either, I have terrible commitment issues, I come from a long line of blacksheep and misfits, lol.  To those still concerned, I can only say, I am happy to say 'I don't know you and you don't know me', should they need it in writing

Still all about me, me, me......

Anyways lets hope that Sonia keeps to her word when she states:-"the film includes expert testimony from those who have studied the case as well as encounters with the people at the very heart of the story."

Who could these 'experts' that have studied the case be? I can only hope that it's not some internet blogging, twitter twats or the likes and it's somebody reputable.

I just saw the reference to internet blogging and twitter twats. I am curious to know what kind of expert you have in mind? A criminal investigator like Donal McIntyre or Mark Williams-Thomas. Perhaps a psychologist like Dr. 'the McCanns are 100% innocent', Sharon Leal? Or someone who has studied the case (from EVERY angle) for the last 8 years? Perhaps you would like to put yourself forward? Or do you have others in mind?


 



You are concerned about being tainted by association HKF.  I am just making it categorically clear that there is no association whatsoever. It is as if we come from parallel universes,

Mimi wrote:Still think it`s unwise to go bashing a prospective work and it`s creator before it`s even been seen.  That sort of behaviour is reminiscent of someone called -

Good one Mimi.

@mimi

Cristobell wrote:

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

Cristobell wrote:It is only of interest to themselves Freedom, it doesn't bother me one iota what people think, if they judge my character by that misquote in the Sun, then their intentions are clear.  There really isn't anything I can do or say to appease those who think their own reputations have been besmirched by association, other than reiterate, I am a lone wolf(ess), I am not affiliated to anyone, not online, and not in the real world either, I have terrible commitment issues, I come from a long line of blacksheep and misfits, lol.  To those still concerned, I can only say, I am happy to say 'I don't know you and you don't know me', should they need it in writing

Still all about me, me, me......

Anyways lets hope that Sonia keeps to her word when she states:-"the film includes expert testimony from those who have studied the case as well as encounters with the people at the very heart of the story."

Who could these 'experts' that have studied the case be? I can only hope that it's not some internet blogging, twitter twats or the likes and it's somebody reputable.

 



You are concerned about being tainted by association HKF.  I am just making it categorically clear that there is no association whatsoever. It is as if we come from parallel universes,

No I'm not, I'm pointing out some statements have been made i.e. the timing is not right, expert testimonies, information that's already in the public domain, your involvement etc.

Leaving aside your attention seeking, I thought these were all legitimate questions.

Mimi wrote:Still think it`s unwise to go bashing a prospective work and it`s creator before it`s even been seen.  That sort of behaviour is reminiscent of someone called -

Is this not a discussion forum? Are we only allowed to discuss the untold story documentary after it's been aired (we could be waiting a long time, who knows) or can we discuss the trailer and the associated web page contents?

ETA. We have had similar documentary claims before 2tv2 (or something like that) which came to nothing

You were discussing Cristobell and me me me and her attention seeking it looked like.

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

Mimi wrote:Still think it`s unwise to go bashing a prospective work and it`s creator before it`s even been seen.  That sort of behaviour is reminiscent of someone called -

Is this not a discussion forum? Are we only allowed to discuss the untold story documentary after it's been aired (we could be waiting a long time, who knows) or can we discuss the trailer and the associated web page contents?

ETA.  We have had similar documentary claims before 2tv2 (or something like that) which came to nothing

People can discuss what they want HKP - all I said is that I think it`s unwise before it`s even been seen - you think the opposite - and that`s ok.

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

Cristobell wrote:

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

Cristobell wrote:It is only of interest to themselves Freedom, it doesn't bother me one iota what people think, if they judge my character by that misquote in the Sun, then their intentions are clear.  There really isn't anything I can do or say to appease those who think their own reputations have been besmirched by association, other than reiterate, I am a lone wolf(ess), I am not affiliated to anyone, not online, and not in the real world either, I have terrible commitment issues, I come from a long line of blacksheep and misfits, lol.  To those still concerned, I can only say, I am happy to say 'I don't know you and you don't know me', should they need it in writing

Still all about me, me, me......

Anyways lets hope that Sonia keeps to her word when she states:-"the film includes expert testimony from those who have studied the case as well as encounters with the people at the very heart of the story."

Who could these 'experts' that have studied the case be? I can only hope that it's not some internet blogging, twitter twats or the likes and it's somebody reputable.

 



You are concerned about being tainted by association HKF.  I am just making it categorically clear that there is no association whatsoever. It is as if we come from parallel universes,

No I'm not, I'm pointing out some statements have been made i.e. the timing is not right, expert testimonies, information that's already in the public domain, your involvement etc.

Leaving aside your attention seeking, I thought these were all legitimate questions.

I was answering the points you raised HKF, you stated I was an attention seeker etc. If you address me personally, then I must reply personally.

As for your other questions, the answer are all there - I cannot think for you. Whilst I am sympathetic to newcomers who ask banal questions, you have been around the block a few times, so there is really no excuse. If you do not know by now that this case is 'very sensitive', there is little more that I can say.

Hongkong Phooey wrote:
Is this not a discussion forum? Are we only allowed to discuss the untold story documentary after it's been aired (we could be waiting a long time, who knows) or can we discuss the trailer and the associated web page contents?

ETA.  We have had similar documentary claims before 2tv2 (or something like that) which came to nothing

We didn't have the torrents of abuse about that documentary and its makers as we have had with Sonia - not all from this forum of course.

Can we all not wait for it to appear? There really is no way it can be judged unseen.

Mimi wrote:

 I don't get it.

But then I was never any good at charades and Give Us A Clue either!

Inca wrote:You were discussing Cristobell  and me me me and her attention seeking it looked like.

Indeed, and thank you that.

I am currently doing an Irish jig in a very limited space, and trying to attract the attention of a solitary fly. Ah well, the show must go on! Now where did I put that little treasure I found in my favourite bookshop - 'Irish Dancing - what to do with your Arms'.

Say what you see, as used to be said on Catchphrase, Laura.

Toe plus knee = ?????

Freedom wrote:Say what you see, as used to be said on Catchphrase, Laura.

Toe plus knee = ?????

Hahahaha! See what I mean? I thought it was a fingernail

Is it OK to lighten the mood in a completely off-topic way? No? I'm going to do it anyway!

Candyfloss doesn't look impressed with what's going on here..



HKP has lost it! Watch out!



Cristobell's showing off again! (roll eyes)



*Sharp intake of breath* Freedom's in da house...



Oh no...Toe Knee has busted the pie charts out!?!



What! You can't say that Andrew...DELETE, DELETEEE!



Meanwhile in pinky land......Can't believe those mugs fell for the "special account".



Basically ladies (and couple of blokes) CHILL out! You're depressing me!

Just love 'em, TTWO, especially me swinging round in my chair!

OMG - I`m in fits `ere. Literally laughing out loud.

I needed that. Thanks TTWO

Brilliant

ROFL, I luuuuuuve the 'me, me, me' one doing backflips, Absolutely hilarious!

Glad this has gone down well and taken has bit of fun. I was sweating over whether to hit submit for a while...

I shall call on you TTWO the next time I feel like banging people's heads together (metaphorically speaking). Humour is definitely the best medicine.

Inca wrote:You were discussing Cristobell  and me me me and her attention seeking it looked like.

I was discussing with Cristobell, you then pitched in the same question quote:- "it all boils down to defining what an 'expert' is, I except some 'Twitter twats ' as you call them no a damn site more than some experts.

So I would like to know who are the 'experts'?  Every expert that has spoken gets bashed, no one gets a chance, with some so please name a few who are an authority then?"

If you look at what's been posted I've questioned why the timing is not right, who these experts are and who has had input, pretty reasonable questions no?

ETA what has also been pointed out is that the documentary is based on information which is already in the public domain ergo it will be surprising if we learn anything new, however we won't know that until we see it

What a laugh, ya hav ta laugh sometimes, just brilliant!

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

Inca wrote:You were discussing Cristobell  and me me me and her attention seeking it looked like.

I was discussing with Cristobell, you then pitched in the same question quote:- "it all boils down to defining what an 'expert' is, I except some 'Twitter twats ' as you call them no a damn site more than some experts.

So I would like to know who are the 'experts'?  Every expert that has spoken gets bashed, no one gets a chance, with some so please name a few who are an authority then?"

If you look at what's been posted I've questioned why the timing is not right, who these experts are and who has had input, pretty reasonable questions no?

ETA what has also been pointed out is that the documentary is based on information which is already in the public domain ergo it will be surprising if we learn anything new, however we won't know that until we see it

You might not learn anything new and probably those people who have been around for a good few years but I expect there will be many including myself who don't and anyway the more that see it the better imp. It might even contain a few things we don't know Constantly going for Cristobell with remarks like attention seeker, me me me and talking about her avatar has nothing to do with this film.

Inca wrote:

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

Inca wrote:You were discussing Cristobell  and me me me and her attention seeking it looked like.

I was discussing with Cristobell, you then pitched in the same question quote:- "it all boils down to defining what an 'expert' is, I except some 'Twitter twats ' as you call them no a damn site more than some experts.

So I would like to know who are the 'experts'?  Every expert that has spoken gets bashed, no one gets a chance, with some so please name a few who are an authority then?"

If you look at what's been posted I've questioned why the timing is not right, who these experts are and who has had input, pretty reasonable questions no?

ETA what has also been pointed out is that the documentary is based on information which is already in the public domain ergo it will be surprising if we learn anything new, however we won't know that until we see it

You might not learn anything new and probably those people who have been around for a good few years but I expect there will be many including myself who don't and anyway the more that see it the better imp.  It might even contain a few things we don't know  Constantly going for Cristobell with remarks like attention seeker, me me me and talking about her avatar has nothing to do with this film.  

Cristobell last night said "Neither Sonia, nor I, want to do anything that will interfere with the official investigation. "
This infers that she's more involved in the documentary than has been let on, or she is just 'bigging herself up' I don't know which it is but she was asked (by someone else) with no answer.

Hongkong Phooey wrote: Cristobell last night said "Neither Sonia, nor I, want to do anything that will interfere with the official investigation. "
This infers that she's more involved in the documentary than has been let on, or she is just 'bigging herself up' I don't know which it is but she was asked (by someone else) with no answer.

Yes ...... so ?  

HKP you are sounding more and more like the spanish inquisition. You`re coming across as if you`re trying to discredit C & S.  I really can`t understand this.