Sonia Poulton's documentary

Me neither, Mimi.

This is doing people's heads in. Let's all move on, preferably having had a giggle first at the pictures posted a little while ago by TTWO.

TheTruthWillOut wrote:Is it OK to lighten the mood in a completely off-topic way? No? I'm going to do it anyway!

Candyfloss doesn't look impressed with what's going on here..



HKP has lost it! Watch out!



Cristobell's showing off again! (roll eyes)



*Sharp intake of breath* Freedom's in da house...



Oh no...Toe Knee has busted the pie charts out!?!



What! You can't say that Andrew...DELETE, DELETEEE!



Meanwhile in pinky land......Can't believe those mugs fell for the "special account".



Basically ladies (and couple of blokes) CHILL out! You're depressing me!

Excellent TTWO, I do think we need a bit light entertainment here.

Mimi wrote:

Hongkong Phooey wrote: Cristobell last night said "Neither Sonia, nor I, want to do anything that will interfere with the official investigation. "
This infers that she's more involved in the documentary than has been let on, or she is just 'bigging herself up' I don't know which it is but she was asked (by someone else) with no answer.

Yes ...... so ?  

HKP you are sounding more and more like the spanish inquisition. You`re coming across as if you`re trying to discredit C & S.  I really can`t understand this.

Many a poster on this forum and others state take nothing for granted, question everything. I subscribe to that and you only have to look at the various threads to see so do others. Why would we have some characters being treated differently?

Put a sock in it please, HKP.

The proof of the pudding is in the eating. There is no point in dissecting this particular one until it's served up.

Freedom wrote:Me neither, Mimi.

This is doing people's heads in. Let's all move on, preferably having had a giggle first at the pictures posted a little while ago by TTWO.

Ok Freedom, if that's aimed at me, so be it (we can't move on until the documentary is aired  and it now seems that unless you are praising something none of us have seen then you can't question it)

I do find that sometimes on this forum discussion gets stiffled, it's almost if we're trying to be too nice, there is nothing wrong with healthy debate as long as nobody is abusive.

Freedom wrote:Put a sock in it please, HKP.

The proof of the pudding is in the eating. There is no point in dissecting this particular one until it's served up.

Sorry but that does seem rather extreme, as I just stated (whilst you were composing this one), are we not allowed to question? We will end up being a bunch of nodding dogs if we all just go along with whoever.

Btw do you ever ask about the pudding before you eat it?

I'm not praising it - in fact, I am distinctly underwhelmed by some of the things Sonia has done previously.

We could go on and on nitpicking and questioning until the cows come home or the documentary comes out (whichever comes first) but I don't see what that achieves other than a general urge to bang one's head against the wall.

I try to avoid puddings for the sake of my health!

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

Freedom wrote:Put a sock in it please, HKP.

The proof of the pudding is in the eating. There is no point in dissecting this particular one until it's served up.

Sorry but that does seem rather extreme, as I just stated (whilst you were composing this one), are we not allowed to question? We will end up being a bunch of nodding dogs if we all just go along with whoever.

Btw do you ever ask about the pudding before you eat it?

Oh but you were not questioning you were sniping making personal comments about avatars advertising her book, being an attention seeker and the me, me, me comment which has already been highlighted.

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

Freedom wrote:Put a sock in it please, HKP.

The proof of the pudding is in the eating. There is no point in dissecting this particular one until it's served up.

Sorry but that does seem rather extreme, as I just stated (whilst you were composing this one), are we not allowed to question? We will end up being a bunch of nodding dogs if we all just go along with whoever.

Btw do you ever ask about the pudding before you eat it?

Bottom line is, HKP that we can ask a million questions until we're blue in the face and Cristobell isn't going to answer. It would be like demanding ITV tell you what happens in this years Christmas day Corrie episode!

I have pretty low expectations of it myself but I said I would wait until I saw it to give my opinion. And I will (try) to stick to that.

I could always bust out a few more GIFs though.

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

Mimi wrote:

Hongkong Phooey wrote: Cristobell last night said "Neither Sonia, nor I, want to do anything that will interfere with the official investigation. "
This infers that she's more involved in the documentary than has been let on, or she is just 'bigging herself up' I don't know which it is but she was asked (by someone else) with no answer.

Yes ...... so ?  

HKP you are sounding more and more like the spanish inquisition. You`re coming across as if you`re trying to discredit C & S.  I really can`t understand this.

Many a poster on this forum and others state take nothing for granted, question everything. I subscribe to that and you only have to look at the various threads to see so do others. Why would we have some characters being treated differently?

To be honest HKF, over the last few days I have been quite enlightened as too two or three posters here who seem to be quoting similar unsubstantial references in Cristobell's direction re" me me me". Hmmm.... food for thought really. Why not just wait for the Documentary after all we have waited eight years.

candyfloss wrote:

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

Freedom wrote:Put a sock in it please, HKP.

The proof of the pudding is in the eating. There is no point in dissecting this particular one until it's served up.

Sorry but that does seem rather extreme, as I just stated (whilst you were composing this one), are we not allowed to question? We will end up being a bunch of nodding dogs if we all just go along with whoever.

Btw do you ever ask about the pudding before you eat it?

Oh but you were not questioning you were sniping making personal comments about avatars advertising her book, being an attention seeker and the me, me, me comment which has already been highlighted.

You've chosen to highlight those parts, I've chosen to highlight, if the time is not right to release the documentary, why is that, when will the time be right (is it when OG finishes for example). Experts in the case have been mentioned (on the web page) I asked who they could be (hoping that it wasn't some nutter from Twitter). The web page also states that the documentary is based on information in the public domain, my question is what's going to be new for us in forum land. Which if any of these questions is not questioning?

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

candyfloss wrote:

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

Freedom wrote:Put a sock in it please, HKP.

The proof of the pudding is in the eating. There is no point in dissecting this particular one until it's served up.

Sorry but that does seem rather extreme, as I just stated (whilst you were composing this one), are we not allowed to question? We will end up being a bunch of nodding dogs if we all just go along with whoever.

Btw do you ever ask about the pudding before you eat it?

Oh but you were not questioning you were sniping making personal comments about avatars advertising her book, being an attention seeker and the me, me, me comment which has already been highlighted.

You've chosen to highlight those parts, I've chosen to highlight, if the time is not right to release the documentary, why is that, when will the time be right (is it when OG finishes for example). Experts in the case have been mentioned (on the web page) I asked who they could be (hoping that it wasn't some nutter from Twitter). The web page also states that the documentary is based on information in the public domain, my question is what's going to be new for us in forum land. Which if any of these questions is not questioning?

You can question all you like but as I posted in that tweet earlier, Sonia has said she is keeping her cards close to her chest and I don't blame her, so you can keep asking but you ain't going to find out.  It reminds me of the kid who  keeps asking 'are we there yet' every few minutes.

costello wrote:

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

Mimi wrote:

Hongkong Phooey wrote: Cristobell last night said "Neither Sonia, nor I, want to do anything that will interfere with the official investigation. "
This infers that she's more involved in the documentary than has been let on, or she is just 'bigging herself up' I don't know which it is but she was asked (by someone else) with no answer.

Yes ...... so ?  

HKP you are sounding more and more like the spanish inquisition. You`re coming across as if you`re trying to discredit C & S.  I really can`t understand this.

Many a poster on this forum and others state take nothing for granted, question everything. I subscribe to that and you only have to look at the various threads to see so do others. Why would we have some characters being treated differently?

To be honest HKF, over the last few days I have been quite enlightened as too two or three posters here who seem to be quoting similar unsubstantial references in Cristobell's direction re" me me me". Hmmm.... food for thought really. Why not just wait for the Documentary after all we have waited eight years.

Why not wait? We could say the same about the whole case, why not wait until somebody is charged/jailed then we can discuss it. The documentary will supposedly air at some point, however we don't know when (I'm not necessarily doubting whether it will air or not)

Ok, this is a discussion forum is it not. Sonia has claimed for over a year that a documentary is being produced, it may be another year (who knows) before we see it. So we're not allowed to question what the content and participants could be. I'm not asking Sonia these questions I'm asking the members here! We are supposed to discuss and say what we think, come up with ideas etc. Or we just sit in silence, waiting.

Aaargh! Please stop copying all the previous comments with your posts!

I've deleted them.

That is a very good idea - we sit in silence and wait.

Now it's goodnight from him and it's goodnight from me.

Freedom wrote:Aaargh! Please stop copying all the previous comments with your posts!

I've deleted them.

That is a very good idea - we sit in silence and wait.

Now it's goodnight from him and it's goodnight from me.

Night then

I have learned to expect the least and hope for the best where this case is concerned, and it has stood me in good stead.  

I am interested to see what SP's documentary is all about, and I hope she proves her critics wrong. Either way it doesn't hurt to wait and see.

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

costello wrote:

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

Mimi wrote:

Hongkong Phooey wrote: Cristobell last night said "Neither Sonia, nor I, want to do anything that will interfere with the official investigation. "
This infers that she's more involved in the documentary than has been let on, or she is just 'bigging herself up' I don't know which it is but she was asked (by someone else) with no answer.

Yes ...... so ?  

HKP you are sounding more and more like the spanish inquisition. You`re coming across as if you`re trying to discredit C & S.  I really can`t understand this.

Many a poster on this forum and others state take nothing for granted, question everything. I subscribe to that and you only have to look at the various threads to see so do others. Why would we have some characters being treated differently?

To be honest HKF, over the last few days I have been quite enlightened as too two or three posters here who seem to be quoting similar unsubstantial references in Cristobell's direction re" me me me". Hmmm.... food for thought really. Why not just wait for the Documentary after all we have waited eight years.

Why not wait? We could say the same about the whole case, why not wait until somebody is charged/jailed then we can discuss it. The documentary will supposedly air at some point, however we don't know when (I'm not necessarily doubting whether it will air or not)

Why does Sonia Poulton's up and coming Documentary bother you so much. I remain positive that it will be aired no doubt sooner than this case will be solved, in my opinion. What I really would like to know is why do a few posters (including yourself) continually pick on Cristobell, there really is no need. I wouldn't be on this amazing forum today if Cristobell hadn't pointed me in the right direction re- her blog, and I am sure many posters will agree.

The problem is that the documentary can't really say anything of any substance that implies guilt/lying/cover-up without being potentially libellous, a situation that is magnified by the fact that the police are involved in an ongoing investigation. There is no way that any mainstream media outlet would contravene this well-established convention, so I can't see that there's going to be anything worth watching. At worst, the TV company could be accused of hampering the police in the course of their duty, so it's a non-starter

Neveronasunday wrote:The problem is that the documentary can't really say anything of any substance that implies guilt/lying/cover-up without being potentially libellous, a situation that is magnified by the fact that the police are involved in an ongoing investigation. There is no way that any mainstream media outlet would contravene this well-established convention, so I can't see that there's going to be anything worth watching. At worst, the TV company could be accused of hampering the police in the course of their duty, so it's a non-starter

I for one am prepared to wait and see, as ever my glass is always half full.

costello wrote:

Why does Sonia Poulton's up and coming Documentary bother you so much. I remain positive that it will be aired no doubt sooner than this case will be solved, in my opinion. What I really would like to know is why do a few posters (including yourself) continually pick on Cristobell, there really is no need. I wouldn't be on this amazing forum today if Cristobell hadn't pointed me in the right direction re- her blog, and I am sure many posters will agree.

What makes you think Sonia's documentary bothers me just because I question it? I would prefer if it was a rip-roaring success, however if she had just shut up produced and launched it without the 'I'm making a documentary' which was commissioned and will be aired on mainstream TV (independently financed in reality, probably never be seen on mainstream), then personally for me it would have held more credibility.

As with loads in this case, we question when we don't know the truth or evidence etc. Why should this proposed documentary be any different, we did it with the 2tv2 documentary trailers and nobody batted an eyelid.

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

costello wrote:

Why does Sonia Poulton's up and coming Documentary bother you so much. I remain positive that it will be aired no doubt sooner than this case will be solved, in my opinion. What I really would like to know is why do a few posters (including yourself) continually pick on Cristobell, there really is no need. I wouldn't be on this amazing forum today if Cristobell hadn't pointed me in the right direction re- her blog, and I am sure many posters will agree.

What makes you think Sonia's documentary bothers me just because I question it? I would prefer if it was a rip-roaring success, however if she had just shut up produced and launched it without the 'I'm making a documentary' which was commissioned and will be aired on mainstream TV (independently financed in reality, probably never be seen on mainstream), then personally for me it would have held more credibility.

As with loads in this case, we question when we don't know the truth or evidence etc. Why should this proposed documentary be any different, we did it with the 2tv2 documentary trailers and nobody batted an eyelid.

Big difference HKP, no one had heard of them, whilst Sonia is well known TV commentator and freelance journalist with many thousands following her on twitter.

candyfloss wrote:
Big difference HKP, no one had heard of them, whilst Sonia is well known TV commentator and freelance journalist with many thousands following her on twitter.

Really, so that makes her or what she produces undiscussable?

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

candyfloss wrote:
Big difference HKP, no one had heard of them, whilst Sonia is well known TV commentator and freelance journalist with many thousands following her on twitter.

Really, so that makes her or what she produces undiscussable?

Oh do give over HKP, you know I said no such thing, I am pointing out to you that attacking someone personally is not welcome.

candyfloss wrote:

Hongkong Phooey wrote:

candyfloss wrote:
Big difference HKP, no one had heard of them, whilst Sonia is well known TV commentator and freelance journalist with many thousands following her on twitter.

Really, so that makes her or what she produces undiscussable?

Oh do give over HKP, you know I said no such thing, I am pointing out to you that attacking someone personally is not welcome.

Eh? You jumped in on my 2tv2 comment (should be 2&2tv), and you've already given me a row for what you term attacking someone personally (which is s ridiculous statement, I don't attack people)