No more forensic work on Madeleine McCann case say British Police

Freedom wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/no-more-forensic-work-madeleine-8577193

Thank you for the link.


No more forensic work on Madeleine McCann case say British police





20:53, 6 Aug 2016
Updated 20:53, 6 Aug 2016
By Nick Dorman


Operation Grange was costing more and more of taxpayers money while other areas face budget cuts

British police hunting for missing Madeleine McCann have made the decision to stop all forensic work.

The Sunday Mirror can reveal the final scientific tests on the case were completed three months ago as part of Scotland Yard’s £12million inquiry.

Operation Grange was launched by ex-PM David Cameron five years ago to find the doctors’ daughter, who vanished, aged three, during a holiday to Portugal in 2007.

But it is expected to be shelved in the autumn amid concerns about its spiralling cost while other areas of policing face budget cuts.

A source said: “The final forensics were carried out about three months ago but, sadly, they didn’t take us forward. There are no plans for any further forensic work to take place.”

It had been hoped tests could be carried out on hairs recovered from the holiday flat from which Madeleine vanished.

It is a further blow for parents Kate and Gerry, who lost a £434,000 libel payout in April from a Portuguese officer who wrote a book questioning the pair’s account.

The couple, from Rothley, Leics, said: “Until we have answers, until there is news, there will always be hope and we will do everything we can to help find Madeleine.”

The inquiry has taken 1,338 statements and investigated 60 “persons of interest” but police privately concede they are no closer to finding Madeleine.

---------------





Doh, now tell us something we didn't know. How long can you carry out forensic work on the same pieces of evidence.... of course that work is finished!!

Was the hairs the last line of enquiry then I wonder? Where they looking for a hair from an abductor, and didn't find any? You'd think they would have known better imo

I thought they were looking at the curtains as well?

Did they get the curtain in the end?

Not sure - originally it was reported to be the bedroom curtain but I reckon that was an error. This report would have seemed more real if they had named the officer giving the info.

True... "A source said" again

candyfloss wrote:

Freedom wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/no-more-forensic-work-madeleine-8577193

Thank you for the link.


No more forensic work on Madeleine McCann case say British police


   


20:53, 6 Aug 2016
Updated  20:53, 6 Aug 2016  
By Nick Dorman
 

Operation Grange was costing more and more of taxpayers money while other areas face budget cuts

British police hunting for missing Madeleine McCann have made the decision to stop all forensic work.

The Sunday Mirror can reveal the final scientific tests on the case were completed three months ago as part of Scotland Yard’s £12million inquiry.

Operation Grange was launched by ex-PM David Cameron five years ago to find the doctors’ daughter, who vanished, aged three, during a holiday to Portugal in 2007.

But it is expected to be shelved in the autumn amid concerns about its spiralling cost while other areas of policing face budget cuts.

A source said: “The final forensics were carried out about three months ago but, sadly, they didn’t take us forward. There are no plans for any further forensic work to take place.”

It had been hoped tests could be carried out on hairs recovered from the holiday flat from which Madeleine vanished.

It is a further blow for parents Kate and Gerry, who lost a £434,000 libel payout in April from a Portuguese officer who wrote a book questioning the pair’s account.

The couple, from Rothley, Leics, said: “Until we have answers, until there is news, there will always be hope and we will do everything we can to help find Madeleine.”

The inquiry has taken 1,338 statements and investigated 60 “persons of interest” but police privately concede they are no closer to finding Madeleine.

---------------





Doh, now tell us something we didn't know.  How long can you carry out forensic work on the same pieces of evidence.... of course that work is finished!!    

High lighted in red,strange isn't it just over four months ago Hogan Howe was telling us they were on one last line of enquiry,was that it completed within the month?
Nope its a fishing exercise,SY aren't saying diddly squat.
https://youtu.be/n9vJm03dlI8

Shouldn't it be highlighted in pink?

Has Clarence's fingerprints all over it.

Me wrote:Shouldn't it be highlighted in pink?

Has Clarence's fingerprints all over it.

***
That's my take on it too, Me.

Châtelaine wrote:

Me wrote:Shouldn't it be highlighted in pink?

Has Clarence's fingerprints all over it.

***
That's my take on it too, Me.

Sign of desperation perhaps, as it's a risky game attempting to speak for Grange, as their team will know exactly where it's come from if it's not accurate.

Wonder why the McCann team would take such a risk?

Desperate times, desperate measures spring to my mind.

It does indeed seem like the McCann's are out of the loop at the moment with Grange.

The Mail is in on it now,took the spokesman all day to get them interested.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3728232/British-police-searching-Madeleine-McCann-confirm-ended-forensic-investigation-latest-tests-didn-t-forward.html

I was reading these 'source-planted' stories whilst I was away. Ridiculous nonsense as usual.

Snipped from the mail:

The announcement to axe all forensic work from the inquiry comes after the final scientific tests carried out three months ago 'didn't take the police forward'.

What announcement?

What did I miss and when did SY announce that?

SY not giving a running commentary but the source giving a desperate commentary on everything.

The thing is NW hasn't came out and said diddly squat afaik

I haven't seen anything from Grange at all either.... Nicola Wall has kept totally silent, not a peep from her.

Exactly.

Just a load of drivel that comes out of the 'sources' rear.

But what gets me is why is it allowed...

The same article from last week which did the rounds everywhere but interesting to read some of the comments left on this one:

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/forensic-investigation-into-madeleine-mccann-1489408027074614.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw