CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007

Cheers Costello. Admittedly not read it all, but thanks for the correction.

The tennis ball photo of a girl supposedly 90cm in height. 

Yet another mystery.

Andrew wrote:The tennis ball photo of a girl supposedly 90cm in height. 

Yet another mystery.

And showing the knuckles of an adult (bones very prominent) not chubby knuckles like a 3 or 4 year old would have, also such large hands that they can hold 3 tennis balls at one go.  A big feat for such a young child.

Don't Forget Madeleine wrote:

Andrew wrote:The tennis ball photo of a girl supposedly 90cm in height. 

Yet another mystery.

And showing the knuckles of an adult (bones very prominent) not chubby knuckles like a 3 or 4 year old would have, also such large hands that they can hold 3 tennis balls at one go.  A big feat for such a young child.

Yep - it's ridiculous.

Don't Forget Madeleine wrote:

Andrew wrote:The tennis ball photo of a girl supposedly 90cm in height. 

Yet another mystery.

And showing the knuckles of an adult (bones very prominent) not chubby knuckles like a 3 or 4 year old would have, also such large hands that they can hold 3 tennis balls at one go.  A big feat for such a young child.

And for me bears no resemblance to any other photographs I've seen of Madeleine.

Apparently Madeleine was small for her age, but to me Madeleine looks like 6/7yrs in that pic.
IMO

dogs don't lie wrote:Apparently Madeleine was small for her age, but to me Madeleine looks like 6/7yrs in that pic.
IMO

I totally agree.

That pic was some distorted, made up experiment that once released out couldn't be put back in.

On the back of it, the photoshopping began.

Imo, etc.

And she was 2 days older in the pool pic, where IMO, she actually looks just about 3 and no more.