CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007

Mimi wrote:

Resistor wrote:I wish I knew where he is a lecturer for.  I wouldn't mind having a sensible, technical discussion with him, without all the screeching, intimidation and rubbish surrounding these threads.

I didn`t know he was a lecturer.

He does reply to comments on his blogs, but I don`t think he`s an expert in IT,

He stated he was an expert in Comp sci and data mining.

Resistor. Please have a look at www.screenshots.com and tell me if you see something odd. I am referring to the screen capture of the home page so input www.ceop.gov.uk/2007-04-30
I cant seem to pull it over on the bleedy tablet but would be interested in your opinion.

caricature wrote:

Mimi wrote:

Resistor wrote:I wish I knew where he is a lecturer for.  I wouldn't mind having a sensible, technical discussion with him, without all the screeching, intimidation and rubbish surrounding these threads.

I didn`t know he was a lecturer.

He does reply to comments on his blogs, but I don`t think he`s an expert in IT,

He stated he was an expert in Comp sci and data mining.

Thanks Caricature - I must have missed that.

Deleted as talking shoite

The name is Henshaw, not Henson.

Should I wear a crown for posting on CMoMM in an open to guest thread and be "wooshed" within seconds ... ?

froggy wrote:The name is Henshaw, not Henson.

Ha got me there. Been doing this too long will delete.

chirpyinsect wrote:Resistor. Please have a look at www.screenshots.com and tell me if you see something odd. I am referring to the screen capture of the home page so input www.ceop.gov.uk/2007-04-30
I cant seem to pull it over on the bleedy tablet but would be interested in your opinion.

I can't see any captures between April 27 to June 26

Try www.screenshots.com/ceop.gov.uk/2007-04-30

If that doesn't work I will go on laptop

Snipped from over the road. Yet again (sorry)

  cloak'ndagger Today at 8:08 pm
Richard Henshaw wrote:
Syn - I've been creating these crawlers for far too many years. Please look at the simple and logical outcome - Fact - the page exsisted on the 30/04/2007. Stop this madness!

Syn you have an agenda .Do you want me to spell out who you are connected to ? You have been given instructions to debunk Steve's find at all costs ..

Care to spill the beans  ?



.... Seems like there are a fair few people over there that have an agenda of sorts.

chirpyinsect wrote:Try www.screenshots.com/ceop.gov.uk/2007-04-30

If that doesn't work I will go on laptop

It's redirecting to ceop.police.uk as it looks right now, by the looks of things!
But there must have been a 30-4-07 capture at some point, or wouldn't have that URL. It's not even redirecting to a different URL, that is definitely the URL.
I have a feeling it takes it's data from Wayback anyway, so if we had looked at this page a month ago, say, we would have seen th CEOP 30-04-07 page in all it's glory. Now that WB have moved all the pointers, it can't find the original page anymore so it's just defaulting to the current one.
But it's still very interesting that the 2007-04-30 URL is still there, and proves that there must have been something on WB for that date, at some time.

Châtelaine wrote:Should I wear a crown for posting on CMoMM in an open to guest thread and be "wooshed" within seconds ... ?

Why did you get whooshed... 

Actually thinking of sticking a post in myself. Only to ask Richard Henshaw to join here.

Probably won't go down well though.

Resistor wrote:

chirpyinsect wrote:Try www.screenshots.com/ceop.gov.uk/2007-04-30

If that doesn't work I will go on laptop

It's redirecting to ceop.police.uk as it looks right now, by the looks of things!
But there must have been a 30-4-07 capture at some point, or wouldn't have that URL.  It's not even redirecting to a different URL, that is definitely the URL.
I have a feeling it takes it's data from Wayback anyway, so if we had looked at this page a month ago, say, we would have seen th CEOP 30-04-07 page in all it's glory.  Now that WB have moved all the pointers, it can't find the original page anymore so it's just defaulting to the current one.  
But it's still very interesting that the 2007-04-30 URL is still there, and proves that there must have been something on WB for that date, at some time.

Don't understand the science but I did notice the different look to the page. If you try 27/4 you get the previous version.
It says we are looking at a screenshot of 30Apr 2007.
BTW I tried typing in mccann.html and got nowt. Thanks for looking.

Châtelaine wrote:Should I wear a crown for posting on CMoMM in an open to guest thread and be "wooshed" within seconds ... ?

I saw it and LIR welcomed you.

Andrew wrote:

Châtelaine wrote:Should I wear a crown for posting on CMoMM in an open to guest thread and be "wooshed" within seconds ... ?

Why did you get whooshed... 

Actually thinking of sticking a post in myself. Only to ask Richard Henshaw to join here.

Probably won't go down well though.

Ha! Dare I risk a link to here?

Dee Coy wrote:

Andrew wrote:

Châtelaine wrote:Should I wear a crown for posting on CMoMM in an open to guest thread and be "wooshed" within seconds ... ?

Why did you get whooshed... 

Actually thinking of sticking a post in myself. Only to ask Richard Henshaw to join here.

Probably won't go down well though.

Ha! Dare I risk a link to here?

Go for it before I beat you to it.. Ha!

I would like him and Resistor to get acquainted. 

Preferably on here so I don't keep having to look over there.

That awful comment about Aquila hasn't been removed so it looks as if the moderators are asleep.

A link to this forum might last for a while too!

Too late he has whooshed himself

Just a thought off the top of my head, which may be way off, but if the PJ were being inundated with all these different agencies descending on PDL on behalf of the McCanns, I wonder if they would have researched them on the internet, if the internet was that easy to access at that time, and may have found that link to CEOP on 30th April 2007 regarding Madeleine and have had to keep quiet about it because they were having to abide by their government/police secrecy laws.

I've looked back through some old posts, Russian Doll said there is no mention by KM in her book regarding what she or GM did on Monday 30th April and that their phones were silent all day, KM only mentioned that they went to the supermarket in the evening to get some supplies, someone else said that Madeleine only spent 15 minutes at the creche in the afternoon and that the creche records for the twins on that day have been withheld by the PJ.

There was also mention that the McCanns had gone to Sagres but there doesn't seem to be any definite confirmation about that as they didn't hire a car (but someone else they knew could have had a car).

It does seem strange that all these anomalies happened on 30th April, the day that the CEOP website seemed to have mistakenly uploaded a photo of Madeleine as "missing".

Chirpy, are you talking about the abusive poster Crassus on CMoMM? The comment is still there.

Freedom wrote:Chirpy, are you talking about the abusive poster Crassus on CMoMM? The comment is still there.

No sorry I was meaning MrHenshaw. He took his leave saying too hot to handle. He mentioned GCHQ and MI5.

Could someone bring over the new Dr Martin Roberts post - it's BRILLIANT

Sorry just seen it!

Blimey, I can't even post as a guest.

Tried to send a polite one asking Mr Henshaw to join here.