Coronavirus - and all manner of weird things evolving from it

History guides us to the present.

IMO!

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/biggs_ch_78.html


https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/1796

Freedom wrote:I avoid depressing forecasts as much as possible.

Some more lunacy close to home. I live next door to a veterinary practice and for the past few weeks humans have not been allowed in. They have to hand their animals over at the door, talk to a vet over the phone and then pay by card over the phone.

Now the degree of lunacy has been stepped up. My son had a message to say that his rabbits are due for their inoculations so he rang up, to be told that only video conferencing is now allowed unless it's a dire emergency.

How his furry friends can have their injections in that way, I have no idea.

STOP THE WORLD, I WANT TO GET OFF.

In the meantime, nearly every evening up to a dozen staff members sit out in the back yard, drinking and socialising, without a face mask or two metres between them.

This is my post from last May. My grand bunnies have now gone to the vet at last but the initial lunacy is still in force. My son had to hand them over at the door and is waiting for a call to go and pick them up. Ridiculous if you don't live locally.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8713155/CURFEWS-cards-ministers-ban-meetings-six-people-Monday.html?ito=push-notification&ci=32706&si=10306854

Not a lot I can say about this but nothing can come as a surprise now.

Freedom wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8713155/CURFEWS-cards-ministers-ban-meetings-six-people-Monday.html?ito=push-notification&ci=32706&si=10306854

Not a lot I can say about this but nothing can come as a surprise now.

It's deliberate chaos and confusion, imo. We are being deliberately kept in a permanent state of worry and uncertainty.

I wonder if Kate and Gerry have been given secret roles as 'advisors' for promoting the confusion is good message?  The government seem to be very good at promoting red herrings while important policy that might not be popular is slipped through.

We've seen it all with the 'sightings' in the Madeleine McCann case and the continued failure to point the finger at the prime suspects. We are now seeing it again with statistics for a virus that are meaningless unless put into context. If the statistics were put into context, the game would be over.

With the benefit of hindsight, one can now see that the Madeleine McCann case was merely an appetizer for things to come. We have a cast of characters that would give the gruesome twosome a run for their money. As far as I can see they are unscrupulous, devious, lacking in integrity and narcissistic. Boris could not be a less inspiring leader so it's not surprising to see the muppet show going on under his 'leadership'.

You've got to love Dr Coleman for saying it as it is. Something our health 'experts' scrupulously avoid as they scaremonger, u-turn, divide and rule and talk rubbish, imo. Dominic Cummings looks like a man who should be tagged and only allowed out on day release with 24 hour tracking, imo. Terrifying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahoCKk8w5oQ

What is happening in Australia is a warning to us all. Insanity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvOcyc3jNcA

All my own views as always.

It strikes me that ONE reason to prolong the agony of the scaremongering about the killer virus, second wave etc is that there has been a MASSIVE financial investment (tax-payers money) into a vaccine for this virus. This has, of course, been driven aggressively by Bill Gates who has used his millions to leverage huge control in this area under the mantel of 'philanthropist''.

Given that there has never been a particularly successful vaccine for a coronavirus before and given the failure of the vaccines for ebola, swine flu et al this seems hugely presumptuous and I suspect this will be another gigantic waste of tax-payers money as the virus will do what viruses do which is die out completely/mutate/lose its virulence so that by the time a vaccine is concocted, there will no longer be enough of the disease around to make it viable. This is assuming, of course, that the vaccine was ever safe and effectively in the first place, which are both huge assumptions. This is typically what happens when vaccines for diseases are rolled out. In some cases, the vaccine prolongs the outbreaks of disease and cases continue in vaccinated people.

However, given that it seems highly likely that Bill Gates has an agenda which is not so much about 'saving millions of lives' but something else, then perhaps the eventual roll-out of the vaccine will succeed in whatever agenda Gates had. It certainly won't be, imo, 'saving people from dying of coronavirus'. It would be interesting to see whether the same vaccines are used worldwide. I doubt it. But we know from flu vaccines that their efficacy is variable as it is very difficult (if not impossible) to predict in advance what strains of flu will be prevalent in any particular year.

There has, of course, never been a vaccine for the common cold. Coronavirus

I suspect the major agenda of the scamdemic is to keep the coffers of the pharmaceutical companies and associated industries nice and full. If people worldwide can be convinced by a computer softwear salesman that they need a vaccine every time they get flu or a cold, then that is worth billions to the pharmaceutical industry. The scaremongering of the 'second wave' is designed to promote the 'biggest flu vaccination programme in history' (Matt Hancock).

"In the US alone, which accounts for about two thirds of global market value, a 1 percent rise in coverage is worth about 100 million dollars for Sanofi."

The global flu vaccine market is worth $5 billion and growing.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/big-pharma-gears-up-for-busy-flu-season-dxtzh82qt

There has, of course, never been a successful vaccine for the common cold. Human coronaviruses are associated with upper respiratory tract infections that occasionally spread to the lungs and other organs.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/jul/19/what-happens-when-flu-meets-covid-19

Gratifyingly, where I was at this afternoon the news was on during which wimp-fest Matt Handcock was delivering the latest doom-laden messages. God he's a prat.

The silly little twit has also threatened that Christmas won't be 'normal' or words to that effect. Not one single person was watching the news where I was. Not one. I happened to glance at it to see the latest scaremongering message that was clearly designed to get us all in a complete dither. With the usual threats of police action. The effect was precisely zero. No-one was watching, no-one was listening (apart from me for about 10 seconds).

Call me old fashioned but how DARE a little toe-rag like  Handcock dictate how people should spend their Christmases or indeed who they spend their time with? What a bloody nerve.


We know whose payroll he's on. Couldn't be more obvious.

Don't let this bunch of utter loonies dictate how we spend our Christmas. Enough it enough.

IMO!  


https://davidicke.com/2020/09/04/hand-crazy-gates-lying-through-his-teeth-down-to-the-roots-about-people-having-no-choice-but-to-have-his-vaccine-the-world-

I know the spelling is Hancock but I can't resist a cheap jibe seeing as he is unrepentant at delivering gloom and doom without a ounce of remorse. He knows what he's doing.

A Facebook friend's comment.

Made the Fatal...'no pun intended' Mistake to listen to the News and the Virus update for the UK. Boris explained it well

ALL Mass gatherings of more than 6 people as of next week ...against the law.

With a couple of exceptions:

Lots of kids in a class room- fine
Working with a full workplace- fine
Trains and buses full of people- fine
Being in a pub with dozens of people- fine
Packed super market- fine
On a plane with loads breathing the same air - fine
Eating out - not only fine but our patriotic duty!!
Certain Sporting events - fine

Having 7 family members or friends in the same house-TOO DANGEROUS - Not Fine

Freedom wrote:A Facebook friend's comment.

Made the Fatal...'no pun intended' Mistake to listen to the News and the Virus update for the UK. Boris explained it well

ALL Mass gatherings of more than 6 people as of next week ...against the law.

With a couple of exceptions:

Lots of kids in a class room- fine
Working with a full workplace- fine
Trains and buses full of people- fine
Being in a pub with dozens of people- fine
Packed super market- fine
On a plane with loads breathing the same air - fine
Eating out - not only fine but our patriotic duty!!
Certain Sporting events - fine

Having 7 family members or friends in the same house-TOO DANGEROUS - Not Fine

I presume it is mostly to do with schools, colleges and universities going back and trying to discourage the spread of the virus among the young who then might pass it on to elderly or vulnerable relatives. I think it's a waste of time and everyone should just get on with it. Vulnerable people need to be careful, but that has always been the case and would apply to every flu season.

I'm convinced they want to make life as difficult as possible until a vaccine is rolled out by which time they will be hoping everyone will be desperate to 'get back to normal' and will be gagging for Bill Gates's vaccine. This will also open up incredibly lucrative markets for universal vaccines every time a new virus arrives on the scene. From a marketing point of view, the more you can persuade people that they are about to die unless they get a vaccine, the more money you can make. It's cheap marketing too as it relies on emotion and plays on a natural fear of disease and death.

Notice how Matt Hancock and his henchmen, despite supposedly being scientists and working in the field of health, never talk about the importance of a strong immune system, the importance of good nutrition and exercise as well as vitamin D. Loneliness is known to be a killer, not just in the old but in the young too. Depriving people of opportunities to congregate and enjoy shared experiences, whether sport, faith, dancing, listening to music or watching live performances is an attack on civil liberties, imo. It will have a detrimental effect on people's emotional and physical health in the long run. Not to mention destroying our arts and cultural scene.

I don't think this government give a damn, though. They've squandered millions of pounds of tax payers money, a small percentage of the very rich have got even richer and they've protected their own backs. A proposal to bring in reforms to prevent another Grenfell Tower disaster was defeated, presumably because so many of the MPs are landlords and don't want the extra expense of making properties safe. It's all about profit and greed, basically.


https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/news/grenfell-survivors-outraged-after-government-votes-down-inquiry-recommendations-amendment-67809

As Bill Gates quite literally rubs his hands with glee and cannot contain his ecstatic grins over achieving what must the pinnacle of his career - a vaccination for every person on the planet for a virus that most people will never be ill with - I think we should listen to doctors, particularly paediatricians who actually care about children's health and what they say about vaccines.

This paediatrician could not present his case more calmly and clearly.

https://www.facebook.com/str8upbrutal/videos/10221395529149672/

I was wondering if I would be allowed into my doctor's surgery today without a mask for a routine appointment. I had a text to say wear a mask and to go into a website to be screened. The link to that didn't work.

As if often the case, when you expect trouble you don't get it and when you don't expect it, you do!

No trouble at all. The doctor was wearing a mask but didn't ask me why I wasn't.

Then I went to the chemist where on previous occasions the assistants were dressed like refugees from Chernobyl but the senior pharmacist was in normal attire with no mask.

This time everyone was normally dressed.

Freedom wrote:I was wondering if I would be allowed into my doctor's surgery today without a mask for a routine appointment. I had a text to say wear a mask and to go into a website to be screened. The link to that didn't work.

As if often the case, when you expect trouble you don't get it and when you don't expect it, you do!

No trouble at all. The doctor was wearing a mask but didn't ask me why I wasn't.

Then I went to the chemist where on previous occasions the assistants were dressed like refugees from Chernobyl but the senior pharmacist was in normal attire with no mask.

This time everyone was normally dressed.

Confusion is good, remember? After all, Gerry McCann was given a standing ovation at the Police Bravery Awards so he has a stamp of approval from the highest echelons of the police force for his heroic attempts to cover up his daughter's death  find his daughter alive.  Given what we know about Leicester police force's handling of the Madeleine McCann case, I would say this award was bizarre in the extreme. In what way was Gerry McCann 'brave', I wonder?

https://metro.co.uk/2007/07/13/mccanns-thank-wonderful-police-540333/

It's good to hear that everyone was normally dressed at the chemist and great that the doctor didn't ask why you weren't wearing a mask.

Lol about the screening website not working! This government showed us their true colours from the very beginning of this alleged pandemic and nothing will change with the same muppets in charge.

If the virus had been as virulent as claimed, and masks work, then we should all have been wearing them at the very outset, not months later when the virus is on the wane.

I think the mask wearing is part of the 'psych-op', It's a very good way of seeing how far people have bought into the scamdemic, imo. Some people never wear them and say they are exempt. You do not need medical proof of this so anyone could theoretically claim this. (However I think on airplanes you might need medical proof). Some only wear them when they have to - I would say that is the majority of people. Then some wear them whenever they are out, even when it seems unnecessary (ie: in a park)  but not that many.

In most of my local shops the shop workers do not wear masks. Those who do are the exception.

So basically, you can tell at a glance those people who have been indoctrinated by fear. I completely understand that there are people with compromised immune systems etc but those people will always need to be careful, irrespective of coronavirus and it would make sense to avoid crowded places if possible.

Another reminder of how infectious diseases were dealt with not that long ago and how doctors responded. Look how calmly the GPs responded to this incredibly common infection with not a face-mask or quarantine in sight.


many mothers have remarked ” how much good the attack has done their children,” as they seem so much better after the measles.


https://www.informedparent.co.uk/measles-hits-the-headlines-again/

ETA: Look at the numbers involved! (Taken from: BMJ, Feb 7 1959, page 354) In the first three weeks of this year about 41,000 cases of measles were recorded

During this period of time, home births were quite common. The midwife attended with not a hazmat suit in sight, even if siblings were in the same house, covered in spots and hacking away with coughs and sneezes. The baby was immediately exposed to any viruses kicking around and of course had the benefit of antibodies from the mother. I was a home birth at around this time. One of my parents was a GP during this time. Never saw a case of bad complications from measles. Not one.

As Boris and his ghastly 'advisors' dish out the latest utter nonsense, it is quite clear that the ghoulish 'party' has to carry on for the time being. Quite why, given that hospitalizations and deaths of people FROM coronavirus are practically non-existent? There are deaths of people who have tested positive for coronavirus, but that means pretty much nothing. You could test people for all sorts of things that are not necessarily anything to do with their hospitalization when they arrive in hospital with serious underlying conditions. You could test them for all manner of viruses, for instance, but whether they are positive or negative does not necessarily have any bearing  on the success of their treatment or on whether or not they eventually might, sadly, die. Doctors know all this, but are remaining remarkably silent.

The media are fanning the flames in a way that is truly disgraceful. But what can you expect from a Murdoch-owned press with conflicts of interests galore and all hands in the big pharma cookie jar (watch those share prices jump!). This is also part of a world economic 'reset', imo, which appears to be dramatically widening the gap between rich and poor as a deliberate strategy.

But back to the latest fad 'virus'. It appears that the deaths of people who happen to be positive (allegedly) for the virus occur in people who are nearly always elderly with serious underlying health conditions. In other words, these people are likely to have died irrespective of whether they tested positive or negative for this particular virus.

I think what is happening here is a desperate desire to prolong the illusion of a 'killer virus' until a vaccine is rolled out. There are obviously huge sums of money involved here but it is also designed to bolster the idea that infectious diseases were overcome because of vaccines. This might be partly true (although it is impossible to provide clear evidence) but there were/are many, many  other factors involved. And as a population becomes more wealthy with better healthcare, then infectious diseases can become secondary in importance to chronic diseases such as we see now as the major causes of ill-health and death - heart disease, cancer, auto-immune diseases et al.

I think we can predict that once the vaccines are rolled out there will be 'hallelujah' moments and the virus will miraculously disappear. Of course, people will just be as unhealthy (or not) as before but the big, bad bogey-man who steals people from their beds in the dead of night will have been slayed, at least temporarily.

If the latest 'flavour of the month virus' is still in circulation, then that will be the fault of the 'anti-vax' brigade who are 'selfish'.  We've seen it all before - it is really very predictable.

The 'coronavirus pandemic' is, in fact, part of a racket. The 'viral fear' racket. Listen to the language as used by Boris and his hideous  'advisors' - the purple prose and mixed metaphors are just cringeworthy. Their language is laden with drama, exaggerated emotion and frankly a load of BS. It is, in fact, text book stuff and they know EXACTLY what they are doing. It's pathetic, really - and ALL about money, greed, power and control.  Why don't all the 'advisors' and others who are scaremongering have to declare their conflicts of interests in all this? Bill Gates' millions have bought so much complicity.

I notice that Boris no longer talks about 'following the science' or 'flattening the curve'. Instead we have the threat of thousands and thousands more deaths and a terrifying 'second wave', rather like a tsunami. Is this WHO predictions or Ferguson predictions or just blatant scaremongering to keep all the sheeple cowed and controlled as winter approaches?

IMO as always!

The viral and infectious disease/epidemic fear racket:

http://www.whale.to/a/infectious_scares.html

The vaccination racket:

http://www.whale.to/vaccines.html

The pandemic threat propaganda operation

http://www.whale.to/a/germ_theory7.html

PsyOp:

http://www.whale.to/b/psyop_h.html

I am very lucky in that I can go about my life in much the same way as I always did but I am so sorry for those whose livelihoods are threatened by this absolute nonsense.

One day there are headlines that the new cases in the U K are at an all time low and the next day they're spiralling out of control again.

Indeed. It is hugely confusing to the extent that you have to wonder if this is part of the whole psych-op? Or something even more sinister.

With millions of people in the UK under local lockdowns and the threat of a second lockdown - despite no evidence of rising death rates from covid - one has to wonder what this is all about? Lockdown will have lead to a great many deaths which have nothing to do with the virus. And the statistics have been manipulated so that covid looks far more deadly than it was. So what, exactly, will be the purpose of a second lockdown?

We know that Matt Hancock lied about 'ring-fencing' care homes. We do not know how many deaths occurred AS A RESULT of lockdown. For instance suicides, domestic violence, drug and alcohol abuse, missed cancers, heart disease and many other serious illnesses.  Is it not more likely (especially given how the statistics were manipulated) that the spike in deaths was in part DUE TO lock down?

The government and media still refuse to put the statistics into context so what does increased numbers of people testing positive actually mean? Can we even believe the statistics? Without knowing what the normal death rate is and how many people are actually dying OF covid (a tiny percentage, if any) then the positive cases are irrelevant, imo. The disease could have done what disease often does and lost its virulence. But our government will not entertain this idea - or at least not before a vaccine has been rolled out I suspect.

A bit of digging into Bill Gates' family background is interesting. IBM has a very murky past. I wonder if this is, in part, why Bill Gates needed to reinvent himself with the 'philanthropist' label. I have to say that given he has unlimited funds to spend on PR, reputation management and script-writers it is truly astonishing how unlikeable he is, imo, and how he was unable to conceal his ecstasy when the coronavirus 'pandemic' was declared globally. Gates is, of course, the largest donor of the WHO, an organisation which appears to have little to do with promoting health, and which appears to be determined to remind the world population how much worse things are going to get. The WHO news is steadfastly downbeat.

A little bit of light reading, for those interested in relatively recent history. As well as looking into the history of IBM it's also worth looking into Operation Paperclip which welcomed nazi doctors to the USA after the second world war.



https://www.cnet.com/news/probing-ibms-nazi-connection/

https://truthandconspiracy.com/mary-maxwell-gates-of-united-way-john-opel-of-ibm-and-the-very-shady-origins-of-microsoft-corporation/

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247479577_IBM_and_Germany_1922-1941

https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol-58-no-3/operation-paperclip-the-secret-intelligence-program-to-bring-n

On the subject of eugenics, Dominic Cummins' mate Andrew Sabisky made his views known. He was employed as a special advisor to Boris Johnson.

“One way to get around the problems of unplanned pregnancies creating a permanent underclass would be to legally enforce universal uptake of long-term contraception at the onset of puberty.

“Vaccination laws give it a precedent, I would argue.”


While the above looks extreme, look how much has been 'legally enforced' in terms of curtailing basic freedoms following the outbreak of the alleged 'pandemic'. Laws have been passed curtailing and restricting the most basic of human interactions such as seeing family and friends, getting married, funerals, visiting sick relatives - even going outside and sitting on a park bench at one stage.

There is no law - yet - banning or restricting reproduction but the laws will have made meeting and socializing with a potential partner incredibly difficult. While at the height of the alleged pandemic visiting a friend or a sexual partner who you didn't live with was illegal, that didn't stop Dominic Cummins, did it?


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/johnson-adviser-andrew-sabisky-contraception-sterilisation-underclass-comments-a9338331.html

I hadn't realized what a 'global operation' the Nazi regime was. I suppose, logically, such a huge eugenics programme could not have been successful without considerable outside help.

This was, in fact, a global commitment by IBM to support the Hitler machine as it conquered Europe and as it destroyed ethnic peoples: Gypsies, Jews and others.



When Nazi Germany went into France, IBM built two new factories to supply the Nazi war machine. This is the 1941-'42 era, in Vichy, France, which was technically neutral. When Germany invaded Holland in May 1940, IBM rushed a brand-new subsidiary into occupied Holland. And it even sent 132 million punch cards in 1941, mainly from New York, to support the Nazi activity there. Holland had the highest rate of Jewish extermination in all of Europe; 72 percent of Jews were killed in Holland, compared to 24 percent in France, where the machines did not operate successfully.



https://www.cnet.com/news/probing-ibms-nazi-connection/

Why is Bill Gates considered any kind of authority on whether or not 'mass gatherings' should happen? Does that mean that people cannot protest about their basic human rights being denied before they submit to the 'coronavirus' vaccine? Sounds suitably Machiavellian.

Recently, Gates stated that mass gatherings might not return until we get the vaccine.

--------

How can the American public fully trust a mass vaccine when the U.S. has a long dark history of medically-sanctioned eugenics-based government policies that have targeted, hurt and killed its people (ethnic cleansing campaigns of Native Americans 1830s, Anti-Chinese Exclusion Acts of the 1880s, 19th century marriage laws against “feebleminded,” and forced sterilizations of Mexican, Black, Native American and Puerto Rican women from 1909-1970s.)


https://www.latinorebels.com/2020/04/29/decolonizingthevaccine/


---------------

Oh dear, oh dear. I happened to look at Dominic Cummins blog. I wish I hadn't. What a pretentious pr***.

Look at his post in January 2020. I hope it got into 'pseuds corner' in Private Eye. He comes across as a precocious, arrogant late-teens intellectual snob. And this is the individual who is the chief 'advisor' for Boris? No wonder we are in such a mess.

We need some true wild cards, artists, people who never went to university and fought their way out of an appalling hell hole, weirdos from William Gibson novels like that girl hired by Bigend as a brand ‘diviner’ who feels sick at the sight of Tommy Hilfiger or that Chinese-Cuban free runner from a crime family hired by the KGB. If you want to figure out what characters around Putin might do, or how international criminal gangs might exploit holes in our border security, you don’t want more Oxbridge English graduates who chat about Lacan at dinner parties with TV producers and spread fake news about fake news.

https://dominiccummings.com/


'

I girded my loins, had a large drink, and watched Doris' latest babblings. Apart from speaking utter BS, in my opinion (for instance, we were never overwhelmed by the first wave so how can the 'second wave' overwhelm us again when we never were the first time?) Apart from being gobsmacked by the sheer audacity of his lies and pomposity, I found myself fascinated by his hands.

The hands started off reasonably relaxed and normal but quite soon clenched themselves into tight fists that looked curiously wax-like, almost like a macabre Damian Hurst display. (I'm looking forward to seeing the Spitting Image models of these.) These fists were then used to punch the air, I presume to evoke a war-time spirit as we unite to slay the wicked virus. It really was the most appalling load of nonsense as the spectre of a killer virus that isn't really  killing anyone any more as people who are dying are dying of other things, was evoked to feely attempt to 'unite' us in a spirit of 'togetherness' to face a terrifying onset of winter.

You really couldn't make this stuff up, could you? Having hugely exaggerated the virulence of a virus that attacks the elderly and immunosuppressed which is what any infectious disease does every year, he then threatens the population with the long arm of the law - and even the army stepping in - if we do not rigidly stick to the laws made literally overnight in which basic civil liberties are denied. Having threatened a police state if a few of the naughty sheeple don't obey, Doris then pathetically attempts to evoke a war-time spirit and 'unite' us with his lambasting and purple prose.

What a total arse! I don't know whether to laugh or cry. Having messed up the economy, caused umpteen deaths with lock-down and discouraging people from visiting doctors and hospitals with other genuine illnesses or concerns, he then tries to evoke a spirit of  national unity.

There is one bit where he emphasises that individual actions will play a crucial role (or words to that effect). This is, imo, a deliberate attempt to place any responsibility on individual members of the population and deflect from his and his advisors sheer incompetence. His speech is Machiavellian in the extreme. I've done a 360 degrees with Doris. Behind his bumbling demeanour is a bare-faced liar, imo, and Machiavellian to boot.


All IMO only as always. What do other people think?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FI0LlSCJL4Q

I'm not sure if I'm brave enough to watch it. For the sake of what's left of my sanity, I read or listen to very little news relating to the virus.

My son and I had high hopes for Boris after he sorted out the Brexit fiasco but now we both say Bow Locks (or something like that) to him.

Freedom wrote:I'm not sure if I'm brave enough to watch it. For the sake of what's left of my sanity, I read or listen to very little news relating to the virus.

My son and I had high hopes for Boris after he sorted out the Brexit fiasco but now we both say Bow Locks (or something like that) to him.

Ha! Very sensible. I don't watch the news any more. I'm trying to get to the point where I'm not even triggered by Boris and his henchmen but can merely watch them with amused indifference. From an anthropological point of view, they are quite fascinating though. I think we sometimes get glimpses of Hancock looking scared - such as we sometimes saw with Kate McCann - sharp glances as if to say 'are they buying this c***?' With Boris, I think he's trying hard to adopt a tone which is suitably stern but also authoritative. I think he fails dismally and just looks stupid. Every now and again, when Boris has really ratcheted up the hyperbole, I think we see a slight play around his lips which I think is a concealed smirk. Gerry McCann was the master of the smirk and of duper's delight. Boris has clearly had his coaching but even so I think that despite the clenched fists and punching of air (who advised him to do that - it really is embarrassing?) he is amused by his performance.

As for the 'health experts' with their massive conflicts of interests, they really are an appalling bunch, imo.

Can't wait to see Spitting Image come back - there is the most rich material for them.

Vernon Coleman is doing a great job.

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/these-are-the-good-old-days-now-are-you-scared_6TdtD55Qb1yTQBM.html

Oh look - we've all been here before with swine flu and millions of pounds of tax payers money thrown down the drain with vaccines that weren't needed and weren't safe and effective either. This is one of the reasons they are having to play out this scamdemic to the bitter end - if they admit that the virus has run its course, lost its virulence and/or mutated,  which is precisely what viruses do, then millions and millions of pounds of tax-payers money has been wasted on vaccines that won't be needed. The FACT that more people are testing positive for the virus yet hospitalizations and deaths from the virus are not going up and are very low indeed PROVES that it is no longer posing a significant threat to the population. Yet, despite this indisputable fact the Government continues with measures to 'control the virus'?
The virus has already killed off the 'low slung fruit' as it were - the government policy of not protecting care homes and isolating the elderly for months achieved that quite successfully. Other 'low slung fruit' such as older people with underlying conditions would also have been killed off by the decision to close hospitals for all but suspected covid patients. Presumably some younger people too with serious underlying conditions who had delayed treatment. I wonder how many missed diagnoses there were as health experts frantically tried to find covid in anyone daring to set foot in a hospital?

What is going to be in the vaccine I wonder, now that people are no longer being hospitalized because of covid? Particularly the vaccines given in third world countries? Boris committed millions of pounds of tax-payers money to support the Gates Foundation (among others I presume) vaccine push for third world countries. Boris, in his role as mayor, is on record as stating that the real issue is global overpopulation. Boris' father shares his views on this it would seem.

The swine flu scandal:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPBMZbC77r0&feature=youtu.be

Boris on overpopulation being the real issue. So when Boris said that millions in tax-payers money was being donated to third world vaccination programmes, so beloved by  Bill Gates, was this really about 'saving millions of lives'? Why would he want to do that, or indeed Bill Gates want to do that, when both have publicly stated that population control is the real issue?

http://churchandstate.org.uk/2016/03/mayor-of-london-global-overpopulation-is-the-real-issue/

The absurd thing is that if you tested millions of the population for any number of random viruses, syndromes or other conditions, you would get thousands of positives. How about testing for the common cold? Oh, there already is one and for loads of other viruses too, including sars....

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080128165659.htm

Dr Vernon at the 15.39 talking about how the number six keeps cropping up in the scamdemic.

"I expect to see Doris riding around in a car with a 666 number-plate."

Brilliant! I've got an image of Noddy and Big Ears in a car with a 666 number plate.


https://brandnewtube.com/watch/these-are-the-good-old-days-now-are-you-scared_6TdtD55Qb1yTQBM.html

Oh Good - exposure of conflicts of interests. Chief scientific advisor to the government Patrick Vallance (I'm not going to give him his title) holds £600,000 of shares with Coronavirus manufacturer Glaxo Smith Kline. This is a conflict of interest given that we have been told we will not go back to normal until everyone has had a vaccine.

https://www.ukcolumn.org/

Gates clearly is OBSESSED with every single person in the world getting his latest vaccine for the latest killer virus.  Does he really want to save millions of lives? Why is Boris so entrenched with the Bill Gates agenda? It is, of course, on record that Boris (and indeed his father) consider overpopulation to be the real issue.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vzFeiKH1jQ

The autism epidemic. When Dr Wakefield and his team suggested offering single vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella, why did our government REFUSE to offer this option until more research was done on the MMR. This was a perfectly reasonable request and was responsible in terms of protecting children's welfare.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/xtSiPgv3IDAJ/

Given that this vaccine is being rushed through, allegedly to save lives from a killer virus, why is it that permission to give the vaccine is going to be given to those outside traditional medical settings? While ostensibly this is to 'rush out' the vaccine before thousands more lives are lost, a medical acquaintance of mine suggests that it is more likely to be that there will be many doctors and nurses - traditionally those who give vaccines - who would not be happy recommending the vaccine or giving it themselves. This is a far more likely reason for allowing the vaccine to be given outside traditional medical settings which at least have a semblance of safety and could potentially deal with any immediate side-effects.

Notice how when the latest measures were rolled out in the UK the little weasel Matt Hancock used the term 'killer virus' despite the FACT that the virus is NOT killing people in any numbers in the UK now. Matt Hancock KNOWS this and is DELIBERATELY misleading the public.

The common cold is always dangerous to people who are very elderly or who have underlying health conditions. There has never been a successful vaccine against the common cold.

I was listening to some parents of teenagers who are at university a few days ago. The situation is dire in many cases. Despite huge fees being paid, the teenagers are living in siege-like conditions in some cases, despite being at very, very low risk of an infection by this virus. They are at far higher risk of mental illness and suicide is a significant risk factor for young people.

Enough is enough.

Who could possibly have predicted this current state of affairs, with laws literally being passed overnight forbidding people to visit their own families?

The coronavirus statistics are banded around as though they are hugely significant, without any context at all. Despite a huge influx of visitors to Cornwall this summer, for instance, the covid cases in hospitals were insignificant.

They may as well test for athletes foot.

Unbelievable.

UK Column News is good and they hit the nail on the head at the end: Boris is destroying democracy. It's true. I thought the Madeleine McCann case was a headf*** but this takes it to a whole new level. I like the way they deconstruct the BBC psycho head-games being played.

The narcissists and psychopaths are in charge unfortunately.

(Mind you, the writing was on the wall when Gerry and Kate McCann became ambassadors for missing children and Gerry was awarded a police award for bravery. And of course Jim Gamble being their arch supporter, attacking people on twitter who criticised the McCanns. That was a bit of a red flag that all was not right at some of the higher levels of the police hierarchy.)

The backlog of treatment for other illnesses is now colossal. But that is not even mentioned as Boris and his henchmen go about destroying our country. What is ironic is that under the pretext of saving lives from a virus that is no longer killing anyone in any significant numbers (if it ever was) they are actually doing the exact opposite. How many lives will have been lost due to lockdown and other untreated illnesses, not to mention mental health issues?

Old people in care homes have already been killed off by allowing elderly patients with respiratory diseases (allegedly covid, but could just as easily have been flu or the common cold) back into care homes from hospital without testing them for what infection they had. Matt Hancock had the bare-faced cheek to lie about having ring-fenced care homes when he knows full well they didn't.

I wonder which groups they'll try to bump off next?

This is classic narcissistic/psychopathic behaviour. You accuse other people of doing what you yourself are doing.

IMO!

https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-30th-september-2020