Tabloid Rags: Various inane stories

The Star's new version...

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/511619/Portuguese-minister-reveals-charge-Maddie-McCann-parents-compassion-abandonment-prosecutor

Is the Star one step up or down from the Sun ?

However, things are certainly coming out now and whatever slant the media give these stories, they put them right in the public eye.

There's no way this can be wrapped up as a burglary gone wrong, no evidence at all for this. And why put it in the newspapers? giving the men a heads up to go on the run? Haven't heard of those men men making a run for it from they were first questioned. If OG were investigating the Mcs, we certainly wouldn't know nor would it be plastered in the papers, IMO.

Just gotta copy this, well done Papa__Rico

I love the name of the "reporter" - Maddy Tup.

Just to put in bold.....

Scotland Yard refused to discuss the final line of inquiry for operational purposes.

A spokesman said: "There is no comment while there is an ongoing investigation."

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/511718/Madeleine-McCann-kidnapped-during-a-botched-burglary

Snipped from the latest Star article that came out about an hour ago..

One of the suspects is said to be a 16-year-old boy who confessed to joining a gang in a bid to buy a sports car.



.... So he was 7 back then was he.

Good one.

Kids in McCannworld are very advanced for their age.

Poor Madeleine was only three years away from demanding her first Ferrari.

Perhaps he was employed as the babysitter and unfortunately two of his older mates let themselves in to see what there was to steal.

Freedom wrote:Perhaps he was employed as the babysitter and unfortunately two of his older mates let themselves in to see what there was to steal.

Ah, now you see, this is getting too silly for words. In case you've forgotten Madeleine was days away from her fourth birthday so she hadn't needed a babysitter for years.

Do they not mean he was 16 in 2007?

Probably but it's the level of journalism in a paper that prides itself on costing 20p. Says it all.

dogs don't lie wrote:Do they not mean he was 16 in 2007?

I don't think they know what they mean.

Desperate 'make it up as you go along stuff' instigated by the ever predictable team McCann. Who imo are feeling incredibly scared at the moment.

Hence all this drivel they are getting the press to print.

Clarence is earning his coin this week anyway.

Very funny, Andrew.

Why do the press print this p!sh?
It's like we are in North Korea and need to be brainwashed.

Not sure but I think Clarence feeds them all this...

This Express article has just come out. Not sure where to stick it so stuck it here.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/665758/Madeleine-McCann-Latest-Nine-Year-Anniversary-Disappearance-Portugal-Police-Investigation

Joana Morais ‏@JoanaAMorais · 32m32 minutes ago

Portuguese Police did not receive any requests from the English https://joana-morais.blogspot.pt/2016/04/portuguese-police-did-not-receive-any.html … #McCann

Just so I have this straight:

1, The press are the ones claiming a request has been filed re: the "last line of inquiry"?

2, Officially, OG/Met are not commenting in any way, shape or form. Not even a hint of what it is?

Madeleine CaseTweets ‏@McCannCaseTweet · 21m21 minutes ago

@missypuddleduck EVEN TODAY news in Portugal
"Judiciaria doesn't believe 3 men are suspects" #mccann @AdirenM

Thetruthwillout did you read Textusa blog today? I thought she hit the nail on the head(and it was a reasonably straight forward read!!

Bampots wrote:Thetruthwillout did you read Textusa blog today? I thought she hit the nail on the head(and it was a reasonably straight forward read!!

Just read it. What a web that has been weaved...!

According to this it is only the BBC that have suggested (insider info via Crimewatch?) the last line of inquiry is related to a sixth Rog.

I think I'll continue to sit back and wait for a (more) meaningful and succinct announcement one way or the other. The case is even upping itself when it comes to being convoluted.