Sonia Poulton interviews

Really intrigued, looking forward and seeing what Son's doc is all about.

I heard there was lots of negativity (as usual) , complaints, abuse, libel even, and just rudeness.

I wouldn't say it was a collective of people who had this view. Highly likely the one with multiple names. (no idea who that is),

let's see what Sonia brings on Sunday (and why someone is shitting their pants)

Look forward to Sunday.

Where will the trailer be shown, on YouTube?

Sorry if it's already been mentioned but I miss a lot of posts, it's very hard to keep up with the forum sometimes.

As far as I can see, there's been no mention of how and where it will be issued.

Freedom wrote:As far as I can see, there's been no mention of how and where it will be issued.

OK, thanks Freedom.  I'll keep my eyes peeled for any future developments.  

Just putting this here a reply to  question on her blog about when the documentary of Sonia's will be out.....



Cristobell Unbound blog


Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton 13th January at 08.08


Sonia certainly has all the material to blow this case wide apart 13.16, but the timing has to be right.

Operation Grange is obviously coming to an end and it would be morally wrong to do anything that would interfere with it at this stage.

It is up and ready to go when the time is right 13.16, and it will be well worth waiting for!

I'm really confused as to why the doc is being sat on.

If because Sonia knows that OG are about to make arrests/come to a firm conclusion then any doc will get lost in the big breaking news hysteria. Unless OG is part of the doc?

It would help to know if the doc will be shown on terrestrial/satellite TV or online only to have an idea if it will get lost in the noise of any dramatic development.

I still think Crimewatch will have the big TV scoop on the OG investigation (if it doesn't get quietly dropped).

Another trailer. Not interested. There's enough trailer-trash and falseness around thie circus. I'll check for news again in about nine years.

This is a comment from a member of a Facebook group called Madeleine McCann Abduction or Scam?

"I know as many of us do, that Sonia was meant to produce a 'true' no holds barred documentary. That was almost a year ago, it has not happened. Sonia has gone very quiet. I have known her for years through my activist involvement, she is normally brave. Why has she disappeared and where is the documentary? I last heard from her 3 months ago and she said that she had uncovered 'difficult' things but was intent on moving on with it, She implied that it was worse than we could think and I've heard nothing since".

I read that comment today Freedom, and from what I can gather the poster is genuine and well respected on the fb site. In my opinion this could be the reason for the delay
in the documentary. What jumps out at me is the quote 'She implied that it was worse
than we could think'.

costello wrote:I read that comment today Freedom, and from what I can gather the poster is genuine and well respected on the fb site. In my opinion this could be the reason for the delay
in the documentary. What jumps out at me is the quote 'She implied that it was worse
than we could think'.

The docu in that case won't see the light of day along with anything from the MET.

I have to wonder what this unseen "force" is that it completely silences hundreds at the Ocean Club, the whole country of Portugal, Scotland Yard, The world media and most amazing of all Sonia Poulton.

From Sonia's Twitter profile:

Journalist. Broadcaster. Social Commentator. Activist. Mum. Has an attitude about all injustice - and doesn't care who knows it

Given how many VIP's, governments, police, media etc that have been exposed for various crimes the last few years what is so bad in this case that silences everyone that looks into it?

Heisenburg wrote:

costello wrote:I read that comment today Freedom, and from what I can gather the poster is genuine and well respected on the fb site. In my opinion this could be the reason for the delay
in the documentary. What jumps out at me is the quote 'She implied that it was worse
than we could think'.

The docu in that case won't see the light of day along with anything from the MET.

Yes that was my first take too Heisenburg. Not so sure now though. I think (well to be honest I'm hoping) Mr Murdoch may just come up trumps here. The 'Sun' has had more
than enough coverage the last two days with Savile, maybe just maybe Sonia's doc is
waiting in the wings.

costello wrote:

Yes that was my first take too Heisenburg. Not so sure now though. I think (well to be honest I'm hoping) Mr Murdoch may just come up trumps here. The 'Sun' has had more
than enough coverage the last two days with Savile, maybe just maybe Sonia's doc is
waiting in the wings.

All after the Saville is long gone.

costello wrote:I read that comment today Freedom, and from what I can gather the poster is genuine and well respected on the fb site. In my opinion this could be the reason for the delay
in the documentary. What jumps out at me is the quote 'She implied that it was worse
than we could think'.

Oh dear. Has she got to the truth so has been silenced?

Or is this thing so massive there is something we can't know? Could it really be a matter of national security after all?

Everyone but everyone that knows remains silent. No leaks, ever. And those on the periphery frightened by gagging legislation, like the nursery worker back in England? Just what is this thing?

Oh, Sonia.

No! oh,Madeleine.

It just doesn't make sense though. If it is something so awful or someone so high profile it absolutely cannot be exposed, why would "they" allow the M's to keep the story in the news for so long pushing the abduction theory?

Heisenburg wrote:

Dee Coy wrote:

costello wrote:I read that comment today Freedom, and from what I can gather the poster is genuine and well respected on the fb site. In my opinion this could be the reason for the delay
in the documentary. What jumps out at me is the quote 'She implied that it was worse
than we could think'.

Oh dear. Has she got to the truth so has been silenced?

Or is this thing so massive there is something we can't know? Could it really be a matter of national security after all?

Everyone but everyone that knows remains silent. No leaks, ever. And those on the periphery frightened by gagging legislation, like the nursery worker back in England? Just what is this thing?

Oh, Sonia.

No! oh,Madeleine.

I meant "oh Sonia" in a rueful way.

When I think of the injustice done to Maddie my blood boils. Words don't suffice, really. And Goncalo and Brenda, of course.

Maybe if they fall the whole house of cards comes with them?? Who knows....I did think that Dr Roberts piece about IRA gun running pushing the limits but hey would be a reason for Gamble and Clarry or maybe Textusas major swinging ring with Vvips holds water.Im about far ahead with this as I was at the begining. I do think the early newspapers and media items hold all we need along with the files......think about how open and curious these early articles were compared to today's sugar coated rubbish!!!

Bampots wrote:Maybe if they fall the whole house of cards comes with them?? Who knows....I did think that Dr Roberts piece about IRA gun running pushing the limits but hey would be a reason for Gamble and Clarry or maybe Textusas major swinging ring with Vvips holds water.Im about as far ahead as this as I was at the begining. I do think the early newspapers and media items hold all we need along with the files......think about how open and curious these early articles were compared to today's sugar coated rubbish!!!

......and think about how many have been whooshed and disappeared   -   interviews, videos which were whooshed off youtube, press reports, it just goes on and on....... just unbelievable.  Sometimes whooshed so quickly too, there one minute, the word would get round the forums, then whoosh, gone or changed!!

Bampots wrote:Maybe if they fall the whole house of cards comes with them?? Who knows....I did think that Dr Roberts piece about IRA gun running pushing the limits but hey would be a reason for Gamble and Clarry or maybe Textusas major swinging ring with Vvips holds water.Im about  far ahead with this as I was at the begining. I do think the early newspapers and media items hold all we need along with the files......think about how open and curious these early articles were compared to today's sugar coated rubbish!!!

And that's the other thing. All the media outlets frightened of Carter Ruck?? Hard to believe, not one, not even Exaro, prepared to persue the truth. Litigation is powerless if you speak the truth and can prove it. I believe the media has been silenced, and not by CR. Or perhaps they realised what they were dealing with and stfu when they saw the enormity. But of what?

TheTruthWillOut wrote:It just doesn't make sense though. If it is something so awful or someone so high profile it absolutely cannot be exposed, why would "they" allow the M's to keep the story in the news for so long pushing the abduction theory?

I think there is a strategic game being played out here TTWO. I also believe this case is massive. Just
my thoughts as ever, seriously hope I am wrong.

TheTruthWillOut wrote:It just doesn't make sense though. If it is something so awful or someone so high profile it absolutely cannot be exposed, why would "they" allow the M's to keep the story in the news for so long pushing the abduction theory?

Its the spokesman who keeps it in the spotlight,run with the hare and hunt with the hounds.

TheTruthWillOut wrote:It just doesn't make sense though. If it is something so awful or someone so high profile it absolutely cannot be exposed, why would "they" allow the M's to keep the story in the news for so long pushing the abduction theory?

It could be their only way of protecting themselves - making oneself high profile immediately and garnering support from the general public and other celebrities. Maybe they got involved in something without realising the consequences and maybe that`s why CM was seconded to them so quickly - not to help them, but to monitor and control them. I can`t imagine GM accepting being told what to do, so would have his own strategy.

Mimi - this thought has often crossed my mind. What if the McCanns are also being controlled? What if they have no choice but to go with the official line too? Would be an explanation of how and why they got - and continue to get - the 'support' they did. But what could be so huge?

If this theory is correct the cover-up is nothing to do with the McCanns' skins.

Something higher than government IMO.  What Britain is famous for the whole world over. Why tourists flock here. Our whole Island heritage.  What MI5 protect.  What the government and judges protect.  Surely it can only be something that big.  I don`t think there would be this great a cover-up even if it was an ex-prime minister IMO.