Maddie gang probe - Cops given cash to probe ‘important’ new lead that Maddie was snatched by people trafficking gang

Bang on unreorganised.... .why indeed.....it makes no sense to make nonsense!

Of course, you know who's been in the "news"* for alleged links to child trafficking these past weeks?

*Not the sort you see on the BBC.

Who? The american brothers?

candyfloss wrote:It is getting beyond stupid this from the Sun article....


[snipped from Sun]
Detectives are following a tip that a gang of European traffickers snatched the tot after taking pictures of her.
It could end up proving that she is still alive, nearly ten years after she vanished.
The search for Madeleine has been extended by months after Scotland Yard was given more cash.








But this I think tells us more, and is nearer the truth, they are in actual fact having to look into all information/leads in order to dismiss/eliminate them...........








[snipped from Sun]
The source said: “There is specific information which is being investigated.
“The team is trying to confirm or disprove it and will exhaust every possible avenue of information, as they always promised Mr and Mrs McCann they would.’’
The source said: “The Home Office has agreed to continue funding the police work until it is completed.
“At present, funding is due to run out next April when it will be reviewed again.”

Members of the public do not, if comments following stories are anything to go by, believe the McCanns. They appear to have very little if any support from the public. The Met must know this

So is this some kind of game with the McCanns? Or is it to gauge public response?

Or what?

There is only one lead worth following, imo, and we know who it leads to. The Met must know this, surely?

From the Metro  "Funding for the new probe is will run out in April when the case will be reviewed again, the source said. "

Read more: http://metro.co.uk/2016/12/04/important-madeleine-mccann-lead-sees-police-given-money-to-investigate-6300411/#ixzz4RrwTYcSR


I'm sure that's what Sir Bernard said months ago, that the additional funding would last until April.   So nothing new, IMO

I suspect the Supreme Court result is in the offing.

It cant be that easy poster....or fhey would have done it!!!

Froggy above....

But they mentioned additional matched funding i believe.....additional to what you mentioned above

A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police told The Independent: "The Operation Grange team are not prepared to discuss any lines of inquiry whilst the investigation is ongoing."

.... Nothing. Zip, zilch, nada.

So lets make up a bulls!t story.

Bampots wrote:It cant be that easy poster....or fhey would have done it!!!

Froggy above....

But they mentioned additional matched funding i believe.....additional to what you mentioned above

I thought they were already getting funding until April anyway and Sir Bernard's previous outing talked about the 'last line of investigation' So what is actually new about this?.

It's just Mitchell style BS, IMO

Bampots wrote:Who? The american brothers?

You need to Google Laura Silsby and Monica Petersen.

froggy wrote:
It's just  Mitchell style BS, IMO

Yep. And it wouldn't surprise me one bit if the source turned out to be him. None of the articles I've read has said anything other than "a source". Not "a Home Office source" or "a Metropolitan Police source" but just "a source", which could be anyone: The office cleaner, a bloke down the pub or Clarence Mitchell. The key question for me is why? Why make a story like this up now?

unreorganised wrote:

Bampots wrote:Who? The american brothers?

You need to Google Laura Silsby and Monica Petersen.

Never heard of either but stuck it in Google as suggested:

https://conservativedailypost.com/hillary-went-missing-for-days-and-now-the-investigator-has-turned-up-dead/

It's clickbait.

The recent articles about the Swedish woman in Rome thought to be Madeleine, despite being the wrong age and looking nothing like her, caused an increase in numbers clicking through to the news-sites and the more views a site gets, the more money it makes.

We are effectively encouraging stories like this by following the links and scrutinizing every word printed.

The story is attributed to an unnamed source while those involved (The McCanns and the Met in this case) refuse to comment which follows the pattern for something that has been fabricated by whoever is laughingly calling themselves a journalist.

Old news is good news I suppose in some quarters.
Note the date
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1041818/Email-warning-Madeleine-stolen-Belgian-paedophile-ring-took-weeks-reach-Portuguese-police.html

I wonder what has triggered this burst of McCann rag activity? Have I missed something?

froggy wrote:

Bampots wrote:It cant be that easy poster....or fhey would have done it!!!

Froggy above....

But they mentioned additional matched funding i believe.....additional to what you mentioned above

I thought they were already getting funding until April anyway and Sir Bernard's previous outing talked about the 'last line of investigation' So what is actually new about this?.

It's just  Mitchell style BS, IMO

I think it probably isn't that complicated. But it's intensely political, imo.

They don't know how to wind it up while also keeping the lid on a giant pile of worms I would imagine. It must now be quite embarrassing for them, imo, because the public now do not believe TM.

So how can the police resolve the case and save face?

They can't really, imo.

Unless it is a ruse to nab TM - but I think TM are privy to some important state secrets and they will bring other people down with them.

No ... ?!

Châtelaine wrote:No ... ?!

Indeed - but what are the secrets?!

You'll be calling me a conspiracy-loon next!

poster wrote:

Châtelaine wrote:No ... ?!

Indeed - but what are the secrets?!

You'll be calling me a conspiracy-loon next!

Hoy. Get your own title. That one is mine.

chirpyinsect wrote:

poster wrote:

Châtelaine wrote:No ... ?!

Indeed - but what are the secrets?!

You'll be calling me a conspiracy-loon next!

Hoy. Get your own title. That one is mine.

Ha! conspiraloon...?

But what secrets?

FYI.   .....tex blog 9pm ish.......

Anonymous4 Dec 2016, 20:59:00
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/2512536/Madeleine-McCann-was-snatched-by-paedophile-ring-to-order.html
This is the info today's articles refer to. This is re-cycled rubbish
John Shord from Met Police vice squad was the person behind the Belgian paedo ring story in 2008, sent to PJ and in files
Who is John Shord in terms of credibility? The Vice squad had a terrible reputation.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/56028/Maddie-We-warned-Portuguese-say-vice-squad
I think someone should question Met officer John Shord, formerly of Braintree Essex.
All discredited by Rebelo
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/A14_5/14_volume_XIV_apenso_V_3033-90.jpg
Who paid him for this info?
Vice Squad - well

Couple of blogs here about John Shord from a few years back:

http://thelostmarketingploy.blogspot.co.uk/p/foi-quest-re-mccann-case-photo.html

http://thelostmarketingploy.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/sabotaged-investigation.html