McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
+22
froggy
niklasericson
Mimi
dogs don't lie
Dee Coy
Admin
Heisenburg
chrissie
espeland
PMR
Freedom
Birdy
Helenmeg
AndyB
Bampots
Châtelaine
Poe
candyfloss
chirpyinsect
TheTruthWillOut
Andrew
bluebell
26 posters
Page 8 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Page 66,so what are OG actually up to?
However, even in the filing order serious reservations are raised as to the likelihood of the allegation that Madeleine had been abducted. Taking into account the doubts raised by the Jane Tanner/Kate McCann version.
Heisenburg- Posts : 1876
Join date : 2016-01-11
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Thank you for highlighting this bit.....the overall picture is so difficult to get a grip of! Reading it is very difficult... ..rhis great translation reads as if they have used an app....very difficult to get a hold of....but the above seems clear. .....and to follow they most certainly should have returned for the reconstruction.....Heisenburg wrote:
Page 66,so what are OG actually up to?However, even in the filing order serious reservations are raised as to the likelihood of the allegation that Madeleine had been abducted. Taking into account the doubts raised by the Jane Tanner/Kate McCann version.
Those doubts that the investigation intended to see clarified by the reconstitution of the events mentioned in the closing dispatch, an initiative however that was made unfeasible by the witnesses' failure to appear after being summoned to. |
_________________
Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts
Winston Churchill
Bampots- Posts : 2320
Join date : 2014-09-07
Age : 63
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Bampots wrote:Thank you for highlighting this bit.....the overall picture is so difficult to get a grip of! Reading it is very difficult... ..rhis great translation reads as if they have used an app....very difficult to get a hold of....but the above seems clear. .....and to follow they most certainly should have returned for the reconstruction.....Heisenburg wrote:
Page 66,so what are OG actually up to?However, even in the filing order serious reservations are raised as to the likelihood of the allegation that Madeleine had been abducted. Taking into account the doubts raised by the Jane Tanner/Kate McCann version.Really important!!
Those doubts that the investigation intended to see clarified by the reconstitution of the events mentioned in the closing dispatch, an initiative however that was made unfeasible by the witnesses' failure to appear after being summoned to.
Quite!
The Truth be Told
@ThePonceofDubai
Why are no newspapers camped outside the #McCann s house asking for a comment on the Supreme Court ruling? @TheSun @thesundaytimes @SkyNews
_________________
Sometimes you will never know the true value of a moment until it becomes a memory.......... Dr Seuss
candyfloss- Admin
- Posts : 12561
Join date : 2014-08-18
Age : 72
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Probably all contact will have to go through their lawyers now,they may well protest their innocence and rightly so,but that doesn't and won't answer how they claim to have been exonerated of any involvement.
Heisenburg- Posts : 1876
Join date : 2016-01-11
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
All gone frustratingly quiet... Just as the momentum was building fairly rapidly and nicely, then it appears to have come to a halt.
Andrew- Posts : 13074
Join date : 2014-08-29
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
I'll bet it hasn't come to a halt for the TAPAS9, they'll be quaking. I wonder if their phones have been tapped.
espeland- Posts : 239
Join date : 2015-06-04
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
You'd expect that wouldn't you? It's a pity Portugal couldn't have arranged that before the news of the case came out, or could they? Especially the part with JT mentioned.
_________________
Fight for Madeleine x
dogs don't lie- Posts : 2876
Join date : 2014-11-24
Age : 49
Location : Ireland
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
No, it would be authorised by the Home Office. But of course, OG could have requested it.
Last edited by espeland on Mon 13 Feb 2017, 12:34 pm; edited 1 time in total
espeland- Posts : 239
Join date : 2015-06-04
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
espeland wrote:
No, it would be set up by the Home Office. But of course, OG could have requested it.
Thanks espeland, was this their last line of enquiry? Is this what they were waiting for? I know, I know...
_________________
Fight for Madeleine x
dogs don't lie- Posts : 2876
Join date : 2014-11-24
Age : 49
Location : Ireland
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
dogs don't lie wrote:espeland wrote:
No, it would be set up by the Home Office. But of course, OG could have requested it.
Thanks espeland, was this their last line of enquiry? Is this what they were waiting for? I know, I know...
That's what many of us suspect.
A real bit of speculation here, there four officers left in OG and four couples in the T9 - one to conduct the interviews in each case with support from the local police. Do the T8 all live in different parts of the country?
espeland- Posts : 239
Join date : 2015-06-04
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
I believe so. I know that JT and RO'B are in the Exeter area and the Oldfields in South London. The Paynes I'm not sure about, nearer to the McCanns or they were anyway back in 2007.
Freedom- Moderator
- Posts : 18180
Join date : 2014-08-17
Age : 109
Location : The nearest darkened room
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
NW works in silence eh!?!
_________________
Fight for Madeleine x
dogs don't lie- Posts : 2876
Join date : 2014-11-24
Age : 49
Location : Ireland
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
I'm sorry but I'm still trying to catch up here. What about GA's book? Will this allow him to publish in the UK. No doubt been discussed on this thread, but so many links etc to read so just wondered if anyone can answer this for me please?
_________________
The pure and simple truth is rarely pure, and never simple. Oscar Wilde
bluebell- Posts : 1677
Join date : 2014-09-01
Age : 107
Location : S/W UK
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
bluebell wrote:I'm sorry but I'm still trying to catch up here. What about GA's book? Will this allow him to publish in the UK. No doubt been discussed on this thread, but so many links etc to read so just wondered if anyone can answer this for me please?
Personally, I think it's only a matter of time before we see his book published here in the UK and sold in the shops.
Andrew- Posts : 13074
Join date : 2014-08-29
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Andrew wrote:bluebell wrote:I'm sorry but I'm still trying to catch up here. What about GA's book? Will this allow him to publish in the UK. No doubt been discussed on this thread, but so many links etc to read so just wondered if anyone can answer this for me please?
Personally, I think it's only a matter of time before we see his book published here in the UK and sold in the shops.
If he can't publish it/them here, he could always publish in Australia or the USA: I got my copy of Spycatcher from New York via post.
espeland- Posts : 239
Join date : 2015-06-04
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
What would be great if one of the mainstream channels showed his documentary on a prime time slot.
First things first though.
First things first though.
Andrew- Posts : 13074
Join date : 2014-08-29
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Andrew wrote:What would be great if one of the mainstream channels showed his documentary on a prime time slot.
First things first though.
Sorry to quote my own - but Panorama were over. Maybe they were doing a translated reboot of it
Andrew- Posts : 13074
Join date : 2014-08-29
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
I think it's time everyone heard the factual side and not just the mcs side.
_________________
Fight for Madeleine x
dogs don't lie- Posts : 2876
Join date : 2014-11-24
Age : 49
Location : Ireland
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Nothing to do with any of the above.
Just didn't know where to put it.
https://www.ecr.co.za/shows/damon-beard/what-would-you-ask-the-universe-to-explain/
Post transferred from the afternoon all topic.
Just didn't know where to put it.
https://www.ecr.co.za/shows/damon-beard/what-would-you-ask-the-universe-to-explain/
Post transferred from the afternoon all topic.
Andrew- Posts : 13074
Join date : 2014-08-29
Page 8 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Similar topics
» 10th anniversary stories: both lunatic and sensible varieties
» McCanns launch fightback against Judges ruling
» Express "hits" ...EXCLUSIVE: ‘McCanns will lose £1m libel trial’ Judge’s initial findings go against couple
» Gordon Brown leaves politics: an innocent coincidence?
» The "number 1 suspect" Christian B
» McCanns launch fightback against Judges ruling
» Express "hits" ...EXCLUSIVE: ‘McCanns will lose £1m libel trial’ Judge’s initial findings go against couple
» Gordon Brown leaves politics: an innocent coincidence?
» The "number 1 suspect" Christian B
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum