McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
+22
froggy
niklasericson
Mimi
dogs don't lie
Dee Coy
Admin
Heisenburg
chrissie
espeland
PMR
Freedom
Birdy
Helenmeg
AndyB
Bampots
Châtelaine
Poe
candyfloss
chirpyinsect
TheTruthWillOut
Andrew
bluebell
26 posters
Page 2 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Katie Hopkins @KTHopkins · 1h
Strangely, this was nearly a year ago to the day... #McCann
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3457221/KATIE-HOPKINS-ll-never-know-really-happened-Maddy-parents-accept-share-blame-let-go.html
Strangely, this was nearly a year ago to the day... #McCann
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3457221/KATIE-HOPKINS-ll-never-know-really-happened-Maddy-parents-accept-share-blame-let-go.html
_________________
Sometimes you will never know the true value of a moment until it becomes a memory.......... Dr Seuss
candyfloss- Admin
- Posts : 12561
Join date : 2014-08-18
Age : 72
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
candyfloss wrote:Poe wrote:I hoped this would happen but I'm still shocked at the speed the whole McCann house of cards is toppling
I think everyone is stunned into silence It was a shock to see that lot this morning though. So what next I wonder?
Red faces from Lorraine Kel and that presenter of Desert Island Discs/ Crimewatch would be nice
Helenmeg- Posts : 693
Join date : 2014-11-11
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
This is good stuff.. I thought people were being optimistic to say this would be in the tabloids but no - it's finally happening. Back in 2007 they were printing
similar stuff and now 10 years later things have finally come full circle.... justice is hopefully prevailing
similar stuff and now 10 years later things have finally come full circle.... justice is hopefully prevailing
Helenmeg- Posts : 693
Join date : 2014-11-11
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
What next...? Try this one on for size.....
Polícia Judiciária issue European Arrest Warrants to the McCanns and their Tapas friends.
Tomorrows news maybe?
Polícia Judiciária issue European Arrest Warrants to the McCanns and their Tapas friends.
Tomorrows news maybe?
Andrew- Posts : 13074
Join date : 2014-08-29
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
http://wizzed.com/the-chilling-things-you-dont-know-about-the-disappearance-of-madeline-mccann/?utm_source=outbrain&utm_medium=00a7c2f61ede158497ad131215c28d7888&ut
This is on SKY. Just can't believe it-- OMG. I read here every day.
This is on SKY. Just can't believe it-- OMG. I read here every day.
Birdy- Posts : 29
Join date : 2015-10-27
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
A very good slideshow there, Birdy. Excellent in fact.
You say from SKY.....?
(ETA - there were a couple of pictures on there that I've never seen before)
You say from SKY.....?
(ETA - there were a couple of pictures on there that I've never seen before)
Last edited by Andrew on Thu 09 Feb 2017, 10:41 am; edited 2 times in total
Andrew- Posts : 13074
Join date : 2014-08-29
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
I can't see anything on the SKY news site at all Birdy?
_________________
Sometimes you will never know the true value of a moment until it becomes a memory.......... Dr Seuss
candyfloss- Admin
- Posts : 12561
Join date : 2014-08-18
Age : 72
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
What ive suggested doesnt reveal any truth....they say it was accident but have insufficent evidence!AndyB wrote:Nope. You're forgetting about the super (inaudible) that, if it means super-injunction, severely constrains what the press can say and are assuming that OG are actively pursuing the truth, for which there is no evidence whatsoeverBampots wrote:Hows this one for size. .....
The McCanns are lambasted by the newspapers accused of everything bar killing M. Their characters are destroyed and then OG publish a Ben Needham style statement saying they know what happened(tragic accident etc!)but have insufficient evidence to prosecute.....McCanns exit stage left for island in med close to PdL or perhaps that would be too close and they may go to the land of plenty down under. Everyone in Uk left bemused!
Anyone else agree to my little scenario??
_________________
Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts
Winston Churchill
Bampots- Posts : 2320
Join date : 2014-09-07
Age : 63
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Just WOW!!
P_R @Papa___Rico · 11m11 minutes ago
#McCann
P_R @Papa___Rico · 11m11 minutes ago
#McCann
_________________
Sometimes you will never know the true value of a moment until it becomes a memory.......... Dr Seuss
candyfloss- Admin
- Posts : 12561
Join date : 2014-08-18
Age : 72
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
It's from a gossipy showbiz site called Wizzed.
I am having trouble accessing it.
I am having trouble accessing it.
Freedom- Moderator
- Posts : 18180
Join date : 2014-08-17
Age : 109
Location : The nearest darkened room
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
It's good to see that folk from the other side of the world are hearing about it:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11797718
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11797718
Andrew- Posts : 13074
Join date : 2014-08-29
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
For me, the worst case scenario (best case scenario for the McCanns) is that there is insufficient evidence to bring charges although it strikes me as unlikely given that the timescale for the investigation has been extended and extra funding provided.
As for the McCanns emigrating, where could they possibly go? Their dream destination would have been New Zealand but they used that poor girl for fake sightings and, as I was typing this, Andrew provided a link to a NZ newspaper. The McCanns made sure Madeleine's name and face are known worldwide. They might end up free from prosecution but they won't ever escape the fear of being recognised.
As for the McCanns emigrating, where could they possibly go? Their dream destination would have been New Zealand but they used that poor girl for fake sightings and, as I was typing this, Andrew provided a link to a NZ newspaper. The McCanns made sure Madeleine's name and face are known worldwide. They might end up free from prosecution but they won't ever escape the fear of being recognised.
Poe- Posts : 1006
Join date : 2014-09-02
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
If written off as a tragic accident that the Mc's knew about there are several more crimes then in the frame. Prevent lawful burial, possibly conspiracy to pervert the course of justice,ones related to obstruction of the coroner etc .Then there's the fund ,people who gave hard earned cash to search for Maddie aren't going to sit back and take it calmly if it's proven that the Mc's knew she was or was likely dead
PMR- Posts : 616
Join date : 2014-09-27
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Wizzed is an internet based entertainment site started by 17 year old Aaron Rice from Cheshire. He started out by creating sites for cheat and hints on gaming sites.Freedom wrote:It's from a gossipy showbiz site called Wizzed.
I am having trouble accessing it.
The whole slideshow has an air of familiarity about it, in style and content. Has someone found an outlet I wonder?
I like the presentation. The photos and short paragraphs keep the attention far better than a long diatribe would. The interactive nature will appeal to a younger audience too.
_________________
Everything I write is my own opinion. Nothing stated as fact.
chirpyinsect- Posts : 4836
Join date : 2014-10-18
Andrew- Posts : 13074
Join date : 2014-08-29
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Posted by PORTUGALPRESS on February 09, 2017
UK media rounds on Supreme Court ‘shock’ that McCanns “have not been proved innocent”
UK tabloids - which for so long have been so ‘anti-Portuguese’ in their reporting of the Madeleine McCann mystery - are changing their tune following publication of the Supreme Court judgement which stressed that parents Kate and Gerry McCann have not been proved innocent in the context of their daughter’s disappearance (click here).
Media sources in touch with the Resident warn: “The tide is turning in UK. Did you know that Panorama was in Luz last week? Tell your readers to batten down, they’re all coming”.
The Sun, the Mirror, the Daily Mail began the day leading with hurtful headlines.
Curiously, the Daily Mail’s “Portuguese court says Madeleine McCann’s parents HAVEN’T been cleared” (with large capital letters for the word haven’t) was later changed to: “Fresh anguish for Madeleine McCann's parents as Portugal's supreme court insists they haven't been proved innocent over their daughter's death”.
But the thrust of the story is busily steaming its way through the English-speaking mainstream while the McCann couple themselves, and their representatives, must be considering a response with care.
Says the Mail: “A spokesperson for the McCann’s did not want to respond to request for comment last night”, while the Mirror - running with the story under “Kate and Gerry McCann ‘not formally in the clear’ over daughter Madeleine’s disappearance” says the Supreme Court ruling “means suspicion still hangs over the heads of the McCanns, who have always claimed their innocence”.
Another cloud highlighted by the ruling is the fact that there remain “serious concerns relating to the truth that Madeleine was kidnapped” (Daily Mail today, as well as Portuguese papers, quoting directly from the 76-page text).
For Praia da Luz - the holiday village perennially dragged into the spotlight over this almost decade-long mystery - the question on everyone’s minds is “if there is a media stampede back” could it spell a rush of welcome pre-season business, and would it disappear in time to let the popular sun-blessed village enjoy a trouble-free summer?
natasha.donn@algarveresident.com
UK media rounds on Supreme Court ‘shock’ that McCanns “have not been proved innocent”
UK tabloids - which for so long have been so ‘anti-Portuguese’ in their reporting of the Madeleine McCann mystery - are changing their tune following publication of the Supreme Court judgement which stressed that parents Kate and Gerry McCann have not been proved innocent in the context of their daughter’s disappearance (click here).
Media sources in touch with the Resident warn: “The tide is turning in UK. Did you know that Panorama was in Luz last week? Tell your readers to batten down, they’re all coming”.
The Sun, the Mirror, the Daily Mail began the day leading with hurtful headlines.
Curiously, the Daily Mail’s “Portuguese court says Madeleine McCann’s parents HAVEN’T been cleared” (with large capital letters for the word haven’t) was later changed to: “Fresh anguish for Madeleine McCann's parents as Portugal's supreme court insists they haven't been proved innocent over their daughter's death”.
But the thrust of the story is busily steaming its way through the English-speaking mainstream while the McCann couple themselves, and their representatives, must be considering a response with care.
Says the Mail: “A spokesperson for the McCann’s did not want to respond to request for comment last night”, while the Mirror - running with the story under “Kate and Gerry McCann ‘not formally in the clear’ over daughter Madeleine’s disappearance” says the Supreme Court ruling “means suspicion still hangs over the heads of the McCanns, who have always claimed their innocence”.
Another cloud highlighted by the ruling is the fact that there remain “serious concerns relating to the truth that Madeleine was kidnapped” (Daily Mail today, as well as Portuguese papers, quoting directly from the 76-page text).
For Praia da Luz - the holiday village perennially dragged into the spotlight over this almost decade-long mystery - the question on everyone’s minds is “if there is a media stampede back” could it spell a rush of welcome pre-season business, and would it disappear in time to let the popular sun-blessed village enjoy a trouble-free summer?
natasha.donn@algarveresident.com
Andrew- Posts : 13074
Join date : 2014-08-29
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
snipped from Portugal Resident article..
Media sources in touch with the Resident warn: “The tide is turning in UK. Did you know that Panorama was in Luz last week? Tell your readers to batten down, they’re all coming”.
Media sources in touch with the Resident warn: “The tide is turning in UK. Did you know that Panorama was in Luz last week? Tell your readers to batten down, they’re all coming”.
_________________
Sometimes you will never know the true value of a moment until it becomes a memory.......... Dr Seuss
candyfloss- Admin
- Posts : 12561
Join date : 2014-08-18
Age : 72
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Very interesting
Andrew- Posts : 13074
Join date : 2014-08-29
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
WOW !!! Things are changing rapidly, there WILL be justice for Maddie IMO.
I found the slideshow on Sky news. Went on Trending & it was down the bottom of page with other sponsored links for Sky. Hopefully it caught the attention of many readers. Now, alas it has been whooshed They must still have the Cruckers still hard at work.
I found the slideshow on Sky news. Went on Trending & it was down the bottom of page with other sponsored links for Sky. Hopefully it caught the attention of many readers. Now, alas it has been whooshed They must still have the Cruckers still hard at work.
Birdy- Posts : 29
Join date : 2015-10-27
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Interesting it was on Sky. In one their newspaper reviews last week, one of the guests highlighted an article on the SC result and was immediately 'shushed' by the presenter. Also, Sonia Poulton tweeted this last month:
Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton Jan 11
Off Twitter for now (contact: soniapoulton@sky.com) but on BBCRScot with Kaye Adams after 11am today #singleparent #myths Happy 2017 Y'all!
She hasn't tweeted since. She isn't directly involved in the case, but does know a lot about it - perhaps she was involved in the slide show?
espeland- Posts : 239
Join date : 2015-06-04
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
The tide is definitely turning at last
chrissie- Posts : 532
Join date : 2014-09-03
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Blimey,well I'll go to foot of my stairs,what the MSM have done is actually print stuff from a court ruling thus negating any injunctions, if there were any.
I think I can see how its been played out over the years, rightly so the MSM haven't been allowed to question the McCann version because this could lead to damages,but what can be done now is explore perhaps other theories or at least mention them because a court has decided that it is legally right to do so albeit from another country.
I think I can see how its been played out over the years, rightly so the MSM haven't been allowed to question the McCann version because this could lead to damages,but what can be done now is explore perhaps other theories or at least mention them because a court has decided that it is legally right to do so albeit from another country.
Heisenburg- Posts : 1876
Join date : 2016-01-11
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Just a thought,wonder if the Express lawyers and others are carefully studying the judgement to see if their stories at the time that they were sued for is closely tied to this judgement,they got their money back from one J Archer.
Heisenburg- Posts : 1876
Join date : 2016-01-11
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
There's a thought.Heisenburg wrote:Just a thought,wonder if the Express lawyers and others are carefully studying the judgement to see if their stories at the time that they were sued for is closely tied to this judgement,they got their money back from one J Archer.
Re: McCanns "not in the clear" - removal of their "formal suspect" status does not mean they are innocent, judges say
Heisenburg wrote:Just a thought,wonder if the Express lawyers and others are carefully studying the judgement to see if their stories at the time that they were sued for is closely tied to this judgement,they got their money back from one J Archer.
Good point. I was surprised that we haven't heard from The Express yet.
chrissie- Posts : 532
Join date : 2014-09-03
Page 2 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Similar topics
» 10th anniversary stories: both lunatic and sensible varieties
» McCanns launch fightback against Judges ruling
» Express "hits" ...EXCLUSIVE: ‘McCanns will lose £1m libel trial’ Judge’s initial findings go against couple
» Gordon Brown leaves politics: an innocent coincidence?
» The "number 1 suspect" Christian B
» McCanns launch fightback against Judges ruling
» Express "hits" ...EXCLUSIVE: ‘McCanns will lose £1m libel trial’ Judge’s initial findings go against couple
» Gordon Brown leaves politics: an innocent coincidence?
» The "number 1 suspect" Christian B
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum