ITV This Morning 21/02/17

The link that you struggled with Andrew ..... was images of everywhere in 5a they(dogs!) found alerts at.....as im sure you are aware of.......

Now you know where they alerted to in the Garden.....and Tex was right.... and we all know where that points!!

The middle picture is the same (different angle) of the picture I posted earlier (with the red line).

The last picture is just to the left of that.

Apologies if I'm being thick here but I cannot see anything at all relating to the other side of the garden in the files (as per Text green star pic).

Am I making sense or talking bollox...

Bampots wrote:The link that you struggled with Andrew ..... was images of everywhere in 5a they(dogs!) found alerts at.....as im sure you are aware of.......

Now you know where they alerted to in the Garden.....and Tex was right.... and we all know where that points!!

Firstly, Bampots, I don't struggle with any factual links. What I struggle with is theories that aren't backed up in the files. That's fair enough is it not?

You tell me where in the files it says the other side of the garden then I'll shut up. Fair enough again is it not?

And please don't try and put your little subtle digs in again when I question Textusa as I'm getting extremely bored of that one.

Facts and evidence not speculation. Please. Thanking you.

Andrew there are three pictures ......the star one is from my Generith link! 
Textusa is almost on same wall as you but round the corner....a tad!.....its not quite under the window or door..

The green star pic and on Textusa's blog is saying the other side of the garden.

I'm saying there is nothing in the files about the other side of the garden.

Quite simple really but wish I never mentioned anything now. Not worth the hassle.

It is really simple Andrew....and there are two walls defining Garden....just so we know this is where tex says....

Andrew wrote:The green star pic and on Textusa's blog is saying the other side of the garden.

I'm saying there is nothing in the files about the other side of the garden.

Quite simple really but wish I never mentioned anything now. Not worth the hassle.

You take it all too personal old chap imo.

I've had a thought that I just want to put out there...

Let's presume Madeleine woke, left the apartment, climbed the wall & fell.

Obviously no third party saw her fall because no-one raised the alarm but it's possible that someone passing might have seen her on the terrace. The whole "Why didn't you come when we were crying?" story might have been designed to cover Madeleine being awake and outside while re-enforcing that she made it safely back inside when, in fact, she hadn't.

Exactly, Bampots. Textusa is saying point C in the far corner. And all I'm saying is that there is nothing in the files to back that up. Unless M jumped that far and crawled back over to the other point to leave a scent of cadaver.

Anyway I apologise for my tone. Had a stressful couple of hours at work and I shouldn't bring that over here.

@H - yeah probably at times. Will hold my hands up as I'm sick of this whole charade bollox and just want it to end. Apologies to you as well.

So as you were folks and I'll leave this thread alone for a bit.

Andrew wrote:

@H - yeah probably at times. Will hold my hands up as I'm sick of this whole charade bollox and just want it to end. Apologies to you as well.

No apology needed fella,all the fat ladies are fully booked for some time,not one available to sing in this opera.

She's coming, H. She's on her way and I can almost hear her from here:



And I'll be wheeling her along myself if she doesn't get a move on.

Andrew wrote:https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2946796/jodie-marsh-madeline-mccann-twitter-parents-kate-gerry-theories/

My goodness she is certainly having her say and letting people know.........
  Things are certainly changing.


[snipped from above link]

During the interview, journalist Mark said he had theories on the case but it was a “difficult story to tell now because there are so many legal implications”.

This apparently angered Jodie, who added: “Why are the Mccanns so concerned with all this legal action? Surely they should concentrate on finding Maddie?????
“If my child was missing, I wouldn’t care who said what about me. I would just want to FIND HER!!!!!
“@KTHopkins isn’t buying it and I don’t thing the majority of the public are anymore….. what do you think?”
The next day she added that she had been “silenced” after she was asked to write an article about the McCanns which was then “pulled”.

This is an old article but just going to chuck it here (move if need):

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1017189/Where-night-Kate-What-grandmother-said-told-Madeleine-snatched.html

They have also struck a year-long deal with the celebrity magazine Hello!, which has agreed to run a story every week in support of their campaign.


I never knew that about the Hello magazine deal... I wonder how much they got paid for that?

I wonder if the deal went ahead. I don't read Hello magazine - I don't possess enough sick buckets to enable this - but I thought I would have heard about it or someone else would have mentioned it.

No idea. Never read it myself:

Just googled 'hello magazine deal with mccanns' and some chat about it on the old 3A's forum:

http://3as.madeleinemccann.org/viewtopic.php?p=295360&sid=4d13661fde25085ad40607adf9b07bce

This as well:

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id124.htm

Might as well sling this one up as well about JM:

http://www.clydebankpost.co.uk/news/trendingacrossscotland/15116078.Jodie_Marsh_slams_Madeleine_McCann_s_parents_after_watching_clip_on_This_Morning/

The Mirror running late with it but just come out a few hours ago:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/jodie-marsh-madeleine-mccann-parents-9914007

Moved discussion here away from this topic, re the Tapas members, and the pact.

https://maddiemccannmystery.forumotion.co.uk/t1757-the-pact-and-tapas-9-what-are-they-doing-now

MW-T talking on the Jon Gaunt show from 27 minutes onwards today 28/2
https://audioboom.com/posts/5657095-pod-three-new-madeleine-mccann-revelations-could-blow-investigation-wide-open-28th-february

I started to listen to this but am now taking what I call a WTF break as MWT has twice referred to the twins as Madeleine's sisters.

He is repeating the theory that she could have wandered off and then fallen into the hands of a predatory paedophile as is thought to have happened with Genette Tate (who has never been found) and definitely did happen with Sarah Payne.

I'll grit my teeth and listen to the rest of it.

P.S. I now have and my opinion of MWT as an absolute tw*t remains unaltered.

Have I got this bit right? I can't bear to listen to any more of him. After saying that the police bungled the case in the early days, he said that the way it should have been dealt with was to investigate the family and those closest first and then move on to the possibility of a stranger abduction - but that the police went for the stranger abduction first?????

Please will someone else listen and see if that is what he said. I had no sleep last night so I am wilting now and maybe got the wrong end of the stick.