The Mystery of Corrie McKeague

Admin wrote:Missing airman Corrie McKeague's family forced to deny he was murdered by his own brother

Internet trolls say the 23-year-old could have been killed by younger brother Darroch McKeague, 21

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/missing-airman-corrie-mckeagues-family-9728969

I feel pretty sure this claim/suggestion was on the "private" , secret, facebook group that have formed.
Not been there but it seems that - again - Nicola has made this very public (in a similar way she posted a statement to 'Haters' when a list of sex sites C had joined) and then the press pick it up.
I wouldn't know how to deal with such people on f/b but maybe just completely ignoring them would be best. imo.

It may have been on one of the FB pages too but it was mentioned on Reddit by someone called Anycolourpurple who is one of those types who is sarcastic and unpleasant to everyone. Others on there say it is a female who has many socks on FB, Twitter and Reddit. Certainly seemed an unpleasant character to me.

I've read Anycolourpurple's posts on Reddit, and agree he/she is a strange one, and I realise MSM trawl social media for titbits.
I just think that a few oddities who make such suggestions shouldn't be given any attention - certainly not in the sense of N making public statements of denial which only brings it to public attention, feeds theses people and makes their accusations appear to have some importance.
Perhaps N needs a "spokesperson" to take care of public statements?? I think Clarence is out of work at present

I thought they identified the cyclist and the old chap....?

Literally can't remember.... TTWO?

Interesting that they've suddenly released this new one as well.

(looks a bit like the bouncer who asked him to leave, IMO)

I'm not TTWO obviously, but that image of the person near the No Entry sign has never been released before. Perhaps when TTWO logs on they can indicate exactly where this is please? TIA.

bluebell wrote:I'm not TTWO obviously, but that image of the person near the No Entry sign has never been released before.   Perhaps when TTWO logs on they can indicate exactly where this is please?  TIA.

Intriguing why they've only released this now, I must say

Very interesting as well imo that in your links Andrew the police are quoted as saying:

"The activities we have undertaken to date have been based on information and facts and not on assumptions.

"Although at this stage we have not received any information from the company employed by Nicola Urquhart, as soon as we receive any information that the company chooses to pass to the police this will be considered as part of the ongoing enquiry.

"Any details coming into the investigation will be checked across the information held, and we continue to work in partnership with a number of agencies including the RAF on the continuing enquiry.



So what help have this MIS actually been so far? Nothing they can forward to the police to help?

There's a slightly bigger picture of the area where this new chap is on this link:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-4185502/Police-searching-missing-RAF-man-release-images-possible-witnesses.html

Should be easy enough to work out where exactly it is (although not for me at the moment).

Yes, interesting @bluebell what they've said there. It sort of reinforces what I've said/thought in the past about MIS, and that they were brought in for 'other reasons'.

A new one just come in from the DM:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4185588/Does-figure-hold-key-missing-Corrie-McKeague.html

Just c/p=ing this statement from Nicola on the f/b page:

On December 8 police released some CCTV images of figures seen in the vicinity of the ‘horseshoe’ between 3.15am and 5.20am on Saturday 24 September. Police have been trying to find better images of these individuals, leading to the release of the further images on January 13. Now a better image of one person, believed to feature in the images released on December 8, as being in the area around 5.15 – 5.20am, has been obtained and this is also being released to see if the person can be identified.
These are the last of the individuals seen on foot in the area between these times that have yet to be traced.

This is a long time after C was last seen surely? Or maybe not?

She's not mentioned the new guy then....?

Andrew wrote:She's not mentioned the new guy then....?

I think she is referring to the new guy Andrew - No Entry Man !!

Sorry guys....Been over at Websleuths trying to pin the location down of the new image! Thought a local got it but some things not lining up.

As for the latest SP PR...pretty damning of the family and MIS and you don't even need to read between the lines.

One thing that must be true is this new image can't be too far away from where Corrie was last seen because of the given timeframe of 03:15-05:20. 05:20 must be the older man in McDonald's (opens at 05:00), bike man must be around ~04:50 or later due to the time of the first image of him and so leaves this new image being 03:15? A max of 9 minutes before Corrie goes into the HS and he's on foot.

bluebell wrote:Just c/p=ing this statement from Nicola on the f/b page:

On December 8 police released some CCTV images of figures seen in the vicinity of the ‘horseshoe’ between 3.15am and 5.20am on Saturday 24 September. Police have been trying to find better images of these individuals, leading to the release of the further images on January 13. Now a better image of one person, believed to feature in the images released on December 8, as being in the area around 5.15 – 5.20am, has been obtained and this is also being released to see if the person can be identified.
These are the last of the individuals seen on foot in the area between these times that have yet to be traced.

This is a long time after C was last seen surely?    Or maybe not?

Now what have Suffolk Police just said? That their case is based on facts not assumptions.....Surely logic dictates 05:20 would be the older man given it was taken in McDonald's that doesn't open until 05:00?

bluebell wrote:

Andrew wrote:She's not mentioned the new guy then....?

I think she is referring to the new guy Andrew - No Entry Man  !!

I read it as the other guy (through the window). They've enhanced the image....

Wait a minute....is the time for the December 8th image 05:18? I thought that person was 03:35? This is getting all so confusing. Why can't the Police just put precise times for all images so there is no confusion!

New question. If 05:18 man and the new 'no entry man' are the same person we really need a time to go with him. I just can't see what benefit a person near where Corrie was seen 2 hours later could provide unless the Police give more details....

Edit: This new image must be around 03:15 because of the times related to the other two men. So if this man spent ~2 hours in the city centre on foot then Police must have tons of footage of him given Corrie was fully tracked on CCTV all night...

TheTruthWillOut wrote:Sorry guys....Been over at Websleuths trying to pin the location down of the new image! Thought a local got it but some things not lining up.

As for the latest SP PR...pretty damning of the family and MIS and you don't even need to read between the lines.

One thing that must be true is this new image can't be too far away from where Corrie was last seen because of the given timeframe of 03:15-05:20. 05:20 must be the older man in McDonald's (opens at 05:00), bike man must be around ~04:50 or later due to the time of the first image of him and so leaves this new image being 03:15? A max of 9 minutes before Corrie goes into the HS and he's on foot.

Hey up, TTWO.

WS is back up and running then? Have you seen a pic of the bouncer who asked Corrie to leave if you don't mind me asking?

Andrew wrote:

TheTruthWillOut wrote:Sorry guys....Been over at Websleuths trying to pin the location down of the new image! Thought a local got it but some things not lining up.

As for the latest SP PR...pretty damning of the family and MIS and you don't even need to read between the lines.

One thing that must be true is this new image can't be too far away from where Corrie was last seen because of the given timeframe of 03:15-05:20. 05:20 must be the older man in McDonald's (opens at 05:00), bike man must be around ~04:50 or later due to the time of the first image of him and so leaves this new image being 03:15? A max of 9 minutes before Corrie goes into the HS and he's on foot.

Hey up, TTWO.

WS is back up and running then? Have you seen a pic of the bouncer who asked Corrie to leave if you don't mind me asking?

I've seen him on the BBC report back in December and had gander at his Facebook...

WS is back up in the parking lot, yes.

... a resemblance of this 'new' person do you think?

Andrew wrote:... a resemblance of this 'new' person do you think?

Hard to say. I think he's quite a big guy and it is hard to tell how big the bloke is in the image. Also looks like the man in the image is wearing trainers? Could have changed I guess but would expect a doorman in shoes/boots?

Andrew wrote:... a resemblance of this 'new' person do you think?

Well the bouncer who allegedly put C out of Flex is on this vid at around 12.10.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtdiCxi9NLk&feature=youtu.be
Bit of discussion on whether it was he or another guy who asked C to leave though.

Thanks bluebell. That was the video I've been looking for but no avail.

At about 2:43.

@ TTWO - he looks a lot bigger/taller at first but then you realise he's on a step.

I suppose it wouldn't be unusual to get changed after your shift finishes (Flex closes at 03:00am I believe?)

Not making assumptions but there is something slightly 'off' with that guy, and at first glance earlier I thought the resemblance was there.

Maybe after all this time the Police have released it to 'turn up the heat'.....